This paper discusses the structural integrity and creep-fatigue life assessment of a commercial size molten salt solar central receiver. The life evaluation is based on criteria that are a modified version of ASME Code Case N-47. These criteria are deemed conservative enough to provide a reasonable level of safety and reliability, and yet not so conservative as to impose severe economic penalties on the receiver. The justification for these criteria and their application to the receiver are discussed in detail.
This paper describes the conceptual design of an advanced water/steam receiver for a commercial-scale solar central receiver thermal power system. The objective was to develop a receiver concept featuring an optimum combination of cost, performance, and reliability. While interfaces with other major subsystems of the complete power plant were recognized, emphasis was on the design and and performance of the receiver. The baseline thermal rating of this receiver was 550 MW, and the steam outlet conditions were 12,860 kPa and 516 C. After technical and econmic evaluations, a quad-cavity, natural-circulation concept was selected as the preferred receiver design. It consists of four separate cavities in a single receiver unit, each cavity receiving concentrated solar energy from one quadrant of a surrounding heliostat field.
A circuit-equivalent frequency-domain electromagnetic simulation for packaging structures is proposed. Simulations are carried out using an iterative memory-efficient approach -quasi-minimal residual method. The convergence of the solver is accelerated by the use of a suitable preconditioner. Results for a power-plane example, with and without aperture, are presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.