The A&P approach, developed by Allen and Pereira (2009), estimates single and basal crop coefficients (K c and K cb ) from the observed fraction of ground cover (f c ) and crop height (h). The practical application of the A&P for several crops was reviewed and tested in a companion paper (Pereira et al., 2020). The current study further addresses the derivation of optimal values for A&P parameter values representing canopy transparency (M L ) and stomatal adjustment (F r ), and tests the resulting model performance. Values reported in literature of M L and F r were analysed. Optimal M L and F r values were derived by a numerical search that minimized the differences between K cb A&P with standard K cb for vegetable, field, and fruit crops as tabulated by Pereira et al. (2021aPereira et al. ( , 2021b and Rallo et al. (2021). Sources for f c were literature reviews supplemented by a remote sensing survey. Computed K cb and K c for mid-and end-season together with associated parameters values were tabulated. To improve the usability of the M L and F r parameters a cross validation was performed, which consisted of the linear regression between K cb computed by A&P and observed K cb relative to independent data sets obtained from field observations. Results show that both series of K cb match well, with regression coefficients very close to 1.0, coefficients of determination near 1.0, and root mean square errors (RMSE) of 0.06 for the annual crops and RMSE = 0.07 for the trees and vines. These errors represent less than 10% of most of the computed tabulated K cb. The tabulated F r and M L of this paper can be regarded as defaults to support A&P field practice when observations of f c and h are performed. Therefore, the A&P approach shows to be appropriate for use in irrigation scheduling and planning when f c and h are observed using ground and/or remote sensing, hence supporting irrigation water savings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.