Background: Pertuzumab provided overall and progression-free survival (PFS) benefits in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients (pts) in the CLEOPATRA (Clinical evaluation of docetaxel, pertuzumab and trastuzumab) study. However, few studies have described the efficacy of other drugs in combination with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab. Here, we present a pre-specified analysis of eribulin in combination with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab as first- and second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC) in a multicenter, open-label phase II study (UMIN000012232, JBCRG-M03). Methods: HER2-positive AMBC with no or single prior chemotherapy for AMBC were enrolled. All pts were administered trastuzumab and taxane as adjuvant or first-line chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle and trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg) plus pertuzumab (840 mg/body loading dose, then 420 mg/ body) once every 3 weeks, all administered intravenously. The primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and safety. PFS was determined using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST ver. 1.1. Results: Fifty pts were enrolled from November 2013 to April 2016. Forty-nine pts were eligible for safety analysis and the full analysis set (FAS) included 46 pts. The median age was 56 years (23–70), and 8 (16%) and 41 (84%) pts were treated in first- and second-line settings, respectively. Eleven pts (23.9%) were de-novo Stage 4, and 35 pts (76.1%) had progressed in metastatic disease after completion of local therapy. Median PFS was 9.3 months (M) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4–12.3). Table 1 shows the efficacy data for each treatment line and includes ORR, complete response rate (CR), partial response rate (PR), stable disease rate (SD), progressive disease rate (PD), not evaluable rate (NE) and PFS in the FAS. The median relative dose intensities of eribulin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab were 93.3% (77.0%–100%), 100% (96.0%–100%), and 100% (89.7%–100%), respectively, in the FAS. The grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) were neutropenia in 5 pts (10.2%), including 2 pts (4.1%) with febrile neutropenia; hypertension in 3 pts (6.1%), and other AEs in only one patient. The average of the ejection fraction did not decrease significantly. Symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was not observed. Conclusion: In pts with HER2-positive AMBC, first- and second-line therapy of eribulin in combination with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab demonstrated substantial antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile. We are planning a phase III study comparing eribulin with taxanes in combination with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for the treatment of HER2-positive AMBC. Efficacy data for each treatment lineTreatment LineTotal (n=46)First line (n=8)Second line (n=38)PFS (95% CI), months9.3 (6.4-12.3)20.8 (2.8-38.7)8.7 (7.2-10.2)ORR (%)28 (60.9)7 (87.5)21 (55.3)CR (%)8 (17.4)3 (37.5)5 (13.2)PR (%)20 (43.5)4 (50.0)16 (42.1)SD (%)11 (23.9)1 (12.5)10 (26.3)PD (%)5 (10.9)05 (13.2)NE (%)2 (4.3)02 (5.3) Citation Format: Kawaguchi H, Yamashita T, Masuda N, Kitada M, Narui K, Hattori M, Yoshinami T, Matsunami N, Yanagihara K, Kawasoe T, Nagashima T, Bando H, Yano H, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura R, Kashiwaba M, Morita S, Ohno S, Toi M. Phase II study of eribulin in combination with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-07.

Background: The combination therapy of Bevacizumab (B) and Paclitaxel (P) has demonstrated to prolong progression free survival (PFS) in E2100 study. Because its PFS is very long, developing optimal therapeutic strategy of B+P, including management of toxicity is crucial. At the 1st International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer, most experts agreed the maintenance endocrine therapy after effective induction chemotherapy. In KBCSG-TR 1214 study, we planned to examine the following clinical questions. 1. As a maintenance therapy, which is more effective either endocrine therapy alone (E) or endocrine therapy with Capecitabine (E+C)? 2. Can maintenance therapy reduce toxicity of B+P and restore patient's QOL.? 3. How effective is B+P re-challenge after failure of maintenance therapy? Methods: KBCSG-TR 1214 study is multicenter open-labeled randomized phaseII trial for HR-positive and HER2-nagative metastatic breast cancer(MBC) patients. Patients will receive B (10mg/kg q2w) in combination with P (90mg/m2 on day 1, 8, and 15 q4w) as an induction therapy. Patients without progression after 6 cycles of B+P will be randomized to E or E+C. Endocrine therapy will be chosen by their physician (treatment of physician's choice). Patients in E+C will receive endocrine therapy with Capecitabine 1657mg/m2 on day1 to 21 q4w. Stratification factors for randomization are menopausal status, presence of target lesion, number of prior endocrine therapies for MBC, with or without 1st line chemotherapy for MBC. After progression of maintenance therapy (E or E+C), B+P will be started again as a reintroduction therapy. Primary end point is PFS of maintenance therapy. Secondary end points include time to failure of strategy from randomization, efficacy of reintroduction therapy, overall survival and safety of induction therapy. Translational research is also planned. VEGF, angiopoetin-1, and apelin in plasma will be measured at four points (before induction therapy, at the beginning of the maintenance therapy and the re-induction therapy, and at the end of the trial). This study has just begun and planned 120 patients will be enrolled. (UMIN000008662). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr OT3-1-01.

No abstract

Introduction Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major problem for patients who receive chemotherapy, and it sometimes deteriorate patients' QOL. Many CIPN prevention trials have been conducted, but no one succeeded to date. Objectives To investigate if frozen glove (FG) prevents peripheral neuropathy induced by nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX). Methods We conducted CIPN prevention study using FG, as part of multi-institutional phase II study which analyze efficacy and safety of nab-PTX (260mg/m2 q3w) followed by FEC (500/100/500 mg/m2, q3w) in pre-operative setting (KBCSG-TR 1213 trial). Each patient wore an FGs for a total of 60 minutes (15mins before and after nab-PTX treatment) on both hands. CIPN were assessed during treatment period with nab-PTX by the Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) and the FACT/GOG (Gynecologic Oncology Group) Neurotoxicity (Ntx) subscale. Patients were asked to access PNQ and FACT/GOG Ntx on a daily basis and recorded in the CIPN diary. Results Sixty two patients were registered for KBCSG-TR 1213 trial. And forty two pts (68%) who turned in the diary were analyzed. Median age and median body mass index (BMI) was 48 years old and 21.6 kg/m2, respectively. We analyzed following 6 categories, 1) symptoms of hands and arms, 2) symptoms of foots, 3) symptoms of general, 4) symptoms of ears 5) muscle weakness of hands and arms and 6) muscle weakness of foots. Median time to each event was 1) 25.5 days, 2) 5days, 3) 3days, 4) not available, 5) 46.5days, 6)4 days. By using FG, time to event of hands and arms was much longer compared with that of foots. Conclusions CIPN could be prevented or lessened by FG. Randomized phase II CIPN prevention study has been just launched. Citation Format: Nakayama T, Yasojima H, Morimoto T, Yoshidome K, Mizutani M, Takashima T, Matsunami N, Enami A, Kagawa M, Nomura T, Shiba E, Nishi T, Kamigaki S, Kozuma Y, Yoshinami T, Masuda N. Frozen glove could be a new hope for prevention of chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-26.