The aim of this experimental study was to investigate whether the intraperitoneal perioperative injection of 5-flurouracil (5-FU)--with or without the addition of interferon (INT)--influences colonic healing. We used 57 male Wistar rats which were subjected to anastomosis of the colon. Intraoperatively, the rats were randomised into one of three groups. The rats in the control group (group 1, n = 15) received a 0.9% NaCl solution; the rats in group 2 (n = 21), 5-FU (20 mg/Kg/day), and those in group 3 (n = 21), 5-FU (20 mg/Kg/day) plus INT (45,000 IU/Kg/day). These drugs were injected intraperitoneally during the operation and once daily for the next two days. The rats were sacrificed on post-operative days 3, 5 or 8. The rupture rate of the anastomoses was statistically significantly higher in groups 2 and 3, compared with the control group (P < 0.05); no differences were observed between groups 2 and 3. Abscess and adhesion formation were more marked in groups 2 and 3 than in the control group; however no differences were recorded between groups 2 and 3. The anastomotic bursting pressure was statistically significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 compared to the control group (P < 0.05), on post-operative days 5 and 8; however, no differences were measured between groups 2 and 3. Histologic evaluation also showed a more profound inflammatory response in groups 2 and 3, compared with group 1. In conclusion, the intraperitoneal, intraoperative administration of 5-FU hinders colonic healing in rats. The additional intraperitoneal injection of interferon does not seem to aggravate this adverse effect.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether delayed, postoperative, intraperitoneal treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus interferon-α-2a (IFN) has adverse effects on colonic healing, as does early treatment. Seventy male Wistar rats underwent colonic anastomoses. The rats were randomized to one of four groups. Early intraperitoneal injection was given to groups 1 and 2 which was repeated once daily for the first 3 postoperative days. Treatment was delayed in groups 3 and 4, from the 4th to the 7th postoperative day. A 0.9% NaCl solution was injected in the rats of control groups 1 and 3. In groups 2 and 4, we infused 5-FU (20 mg/kg/day) and IFN (45,000 IU/kg/day). All the animals were sacrificed on the 8th postoperative day. The anastomotic rupture rate was significantly higher in the rats of group 2 compared to control group 1 (p < 0.05), while there were no differences between groups 3 and 4 (p > 0.05). Abscess formation and adhesions were more frequent in group 2 compared to control group 1, while no differences were observed between groups 3 and 4. Anastomotic bursting pressure was statistically significantly lower in the rats of group 2 compared to group 1 (p < 0.05); no differences were noticed between groups 3 and 4 (p > 0.05). Simultaneous histologic evaluation showed a more profound inflammatory reaction and delayed anastomotic healing in group 2 compared to control group 1; there were, however, no differences between groups 3 and 4. In conclusion, the immediate, postoperative, intraperitoneal injection of 5-FU plus IFN impairs colonic healing while delayed treatment (starting on the 4th postoperative day) has no adverse effects on wound healing.

The immediate, post-operative intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan had a negative effect on the healing process of the large bowel anastomoses in rats. The negative effects of the combination of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan were statistically more significant compared to the single use of 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan.

Hydrocortisone inhibits the healing of colonic anastomoses. However, insulin-like growth factor I given intraperitoneally mediates the deleterious effects of cortisone and protects colonic healing in rats.

Perineal endometriosis, especially with anal sphincter invasion, is a rare occurrence. We present a patient with perineal endometriosis in an episiotomy scar with anal sphincter involvement. The endometriotic mass was completely excised under general anesthesia with portions of the episiotomy scar and external anal sphincter. The procedure was followed by overlapping sphincter reconstruction. The excised mass was sent for microscopic examination, which confirmed endometriosis. The postoperative course was without complications. One year after the operation, the woman is asymptomatic and fully continent. Complete excision including a part of the anal sphincter with primary sphincteroplasty is the best treatment for perineal endometriosis involving the anal sphincter.