images in clinical medicineT h e ne w e ngl a nd jou r na l o f m e dic i ne n engl j med 354;19 www.nejm.org may 11, 2006 2046A 50-year-old smoker presented with acute-onset breathlessness and right-sided chest pain of four days' duration. There was no history of chest trauma. A posteroanterior chest radiograph (Panel A) demonstrated a rightsided pneumothorax. His symptoms improved immediately on placement of a chest tube. Two hours later, he again became breathless, and examination revealed extensive right-sided chest crackles. Chest radiography was repeated and showed a fully expanded right lung (Panel B), albeit with features of pulmonary edema. The arrowheads in Panel B show the position of the chest tube. The patient's condition improved after continuous positive airway pressure was delivered through a face mask overnight. The chest tube was removed after three days. At follow-up six weeks later, the patient was asymptomatic and well. The results of further investigations were consistent with the presence of mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Purpose: A comparative study was performed about the plan parameters and quality indices between volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the two methods of external beam radiotherapy IMRT and VMAT in terms of plan quality and efficacy. Material and method: Fifteen high-risk prostate patients were planned for radiotherapy using 6 MV photon. Three dose levels were contoured having Planning Tumour Volume 1 (PTV1 = 48 Gy), Planning Tumour Volume 2 (PTV2 = 57.6 Gy) and Planning Tumour Volume 3 (PTV3 = 60 Gy). Setup margins were given using the CHIP trial method. The prescribed PTV3 dose was 60 Gy in 20 fractions which is biologically equivalent to 74 Gy in 37 fractions using α/β = 3. In case of IMRT, seven fixed beam angles 30, 60, 105, 180, 255, 300 and 330 were used and the dose was optimised using the sliding window method. In case of rapid arc technique, one or two full arcs were used for dose optimisation while keeping all the dose constraints and other planning parameters same used in IMRT. The plan evaluation parameters and Organ at risks (OARs) doses were calculated using a dose volume histogram (DVH). Results: The average D2, D5, D95 and PTVmean for PTV3 were 61.22, 61.13, 58.12, 60.00 Gy and 62.41 62.24 59.53 61.12 Gy for IMRT and VMAT, respectively. The averages V60 for bladder and V30 for rectum were 22.81, 25 and 67, 65% for IMRT and VMAT, respectively. The average homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) and gradient index (GI) were 1.04, 1.4833, 14.79 and 1.04, 1.704, 7.89 for IMRT and VMAT, respectively. Conclusion: VMAT takes less dose-delivery time and lesser number of monitoring units than IMRT, thus it compensates the intrafractional movements during dose delivery. The Dose GI in VMAT was much better than IMRT. This indicates sharper dose fall off near the normal tissue. No other major differences were observed in terms of plan evaluation parameters between IMRT and VMAT techniques. So, we conclude that VMAT technique is more efficient than IMRT in terms of plan quality and dose delivery.

Background and objective The incidence of synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancer is uncommon and poses a diagnostic challenge to the treating physician about their origin as either primary or metastasis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological behavior, treatment modality-related outcomes, and prognosis related to primary endometrial and ovarian cancers at a tertiary care referral center in South Asia. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers treated at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre in Lahore, Pakistan from January 2005 to August 2017. Results The median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 51 years (range: 25-72 years). The common presenting symptoms were irregular uterine bleeding (30%), post-menopausal bleeding (26.7%), abdominal mass (16.7%), and abdominal pain (26.7%). Endometrial adenocarcinoma type was the most common histological variant found among the participants: 90% (n=27) of uterine and 56.7% (n=17) of ovarian cancers. All patients underwent surgical intervention. Among them, 25 patients received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, four received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 18 received adjuvant radiotherapy. The early-stage group [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I and II] had a more favorable prognosis than the advanced stage group (FIGO stages III and IV).

No abstract

PURPOSE To report the chronic toxicity and disease outcomes attributable to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 2014 and December 2018, a retrospective review of medical records of patients with cervical cancer who received radiation therapy with IMRT was performed. Disease and treatment-related details were documented. Follow-up notes were reviewed, and severity of late toxicities was recorded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years were estimated. RESULTS A total of 222 patients’ records were reviewed. Mean age was 50.7 years. Median follow-up duration was 33 months (range, 2-70 months). The most common toxicity was vaginal stricture (grade 2, n = 59, 26.6%; grade 3, n = 4, 1.80%), followed by proctitis (grade 2, n = 24; 10.8%; grade 3, n = 7; 3.20%). Seven patients (grade 2, n = 5, 2.3%; grade 3, n = 2; 0.90%) developed cystitis, and only 5 (grade 2; 2.3%) were found to have colitis. None of the patients had grade 4 or grade 5 toxicities. There was a significant difference in late complications in patients with nodal disease or those who underwent prior surgery ( P < .05). Three-year OS and DFS rates were 79.7% and 81.9%, respectively. Patients with tumor size > 5 cm and those with pelvic lymph node metastasis had poor survival rates ( P < .05). CONCLUSION IMRT is an effective and well-tolerated technique that should be considered in patients with lymph node disease and in postoperative patients. There is an inverse relationship between tumor size and nodal involvement with respect to OS and DFS.