We have examined the sensitivity of the geniohyoid, an upper airway dilating muscle, to vecuronium in 12 anaesthetized dogs undergoing mechanical ventilation of the lungs and compared it with that of the diaphragm. Dogs were allocated randomly to two groups: pentobarbitone alone (group 1, n = 7); pentobarbitone combined with 0.2 MAC (0.44%) of enflurane anaesthesia (group 2, n = 5). Supramaximal single twitch stimulations (0.1 Hz) were applied to the phrenic nerves in the upper thorax and the geniohyoid branches of the hypoglossal nerves at the neck. The evoked responses were assessed by the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) and the isometric force of the geniohyoid muscles (Tgh) until complete recovery of these variables after i.v. administration of vecuronium 0.02 mg kg-1. In both groups, the magnitude of the depression of twitch response was greater and time required to reach control amplitude was longer in the geniohyoid than the diaphragm. The depression of Tgh was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1, whereas no change was observed in Pdi between the two groups. We conclude that the geniohyoid is more sensitive to vecuronium than the diaphragm and the differential effects of vecuronium are facilitated by a low concentration of enflurane.

No abstract

The effect of sevoflurane on diaphragmatic contractility was investigated in 12 anesthetized, mechanically ventilated dogs with the thorax opened. Animals were divided into two groups of six each: the sevoflurane and time control groups. We assessed contractility by the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) during supramaximal stimulation of the phrenic nerve at frequencies of 0.5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz under quasiisometric conditions. The integrated electrical activity (Edi) of the crural and costal parts of the diaphragm (Edi cru, Edi cost) was also measured. In the sevoflurane group, diaphragmatic contractility was determined during three levels of anesthesia, specifically 0, 1.0, and 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC). Measurements were made at the start of the stimulation (initial) and at the end of the 2-s period (2-s). Increasing the depth of sevoflurane anesthesia did not cause any significant differences in Pdi and Edi at 0.5-, 10-, and 20-Hz stimulation. By contrast, at 50- and 100-Hz stimulation, initial Pdi during 1.0 and 1.5 MAC sevoflurane exposure decreased significantly compared with the 0 MAC value (P less than 0.05). In addition, there was a statistical difference in 2-s Pdi between 1.0 and 1.5 MAC at 100-Hz stimulation (P less than 0.05). The Edi cru showed similar changes in Pdi at both measurements, whereas there was no remarkable change in Edi cost. There was no significant change either in Pdi or in Edi with respect to time in the time control group. We conclude from these results that sevoflurane impairs diaphragmatic contractility through its inhibitory effect on neuromuscular transmission, predominantly of the crural part.

We examined the effects of halothane and enflurane on diaphragmatic contractility in 12 anesthetized, mechanically ventilated dogs. The diaphragmatic force was assessed from transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) developed at functional residual capacity against an occluded airway during cervical phrenic nerve stimulation. Animals were randomly assigned to two groups, a halothane group (n = 6) and an enflurane group (n = 6). The Pdi stimulus-frequency relationship was compared at anesthetic levels of 1, 1.5, and 2 MAC (minimum alveolar concentration) in each group. The sequence of changing anesthetic concentration was randomized. In addition, the Pdi-frequency relationship was also compared between 1 MAC of halothane and enflurane in 8 of 12 dogs. In animals anesthetized with enflurane, Pdi significantly decreased with 50- and 100-Hz stimulation in the presence of increasing MAC values, whereas Pdi at 10-Hz stimulation was not affected by the depth of anesthesia. Pdi with 20-Hz stimulation during 2 MAC enflurane also decreased significantly below Pdi levels seen at 1 and 1.5 MAC. By contrast, with halothane there was no difference in Pdi at any of the stimulation frequencies during any of the three levels of anesthesia. There was no statistical difference, however, between Pdi-frequency relationships during 1 MAC of halothane and enflurane in eight animals. From these results, we conclude that halothane does not impair diaphragmatic contractility any more than enflurane does, but enflurane decreases force generation of the diaphragm at high stimulation frequencies in a dose-related fashion. This depressant effect of enflurane occurs mainly through the impairment of neuromuscular transmission and/or membrane excitability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)