ollowing the development of drug-eluting stents (DES) the interventional cardiologist seems to have overcome the nemesis of restenosis. The First-InMan study and a randomized comparison of a sirolimuseluting stent (SES) with a standard stent for coronary revascularization reported complete inhibition of restenosis in simple discrete lesions at 6 months. 1,2 However, recent randomized clinical trials using DES for lesions with lowor intermediate restenosis risk reported restenosis rates ranging from 2.3% to 16.7%. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Furthermore, the number of DES used and the stent length required for each lesion are both substantially increasing based on the recent recommended policy of full lesion coverage to avoid any potential injury at the stent edges. popularity of DES technologies worldwide, the precise mechanisms responsible for DES restenosis remain unclear. Several case reports have highlighted the occurrence of stent fracture (absence or deformity of a stent strut inside the stent) at follow-up, especially in patients experiencing restenosis with SES, however, the incidence of fracture and its impact on restenosis are poorly understood. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictors of restenosis following SES implantation and to determine the incidence and impact of stent fracture. We prospectively performed the SES implantation under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) Guidance in Native coronary Artery Lesions (SIGNAL) study at the Fujita Health University hospital.
Methods
Study Design and EndpointsThe SIGNAL study was designed as a prospective, single-center, angiographic and IVUS follow-up study to evaluate the acute and late efficacy, as well as safety of deployment, of SES. The primary endpoint was angiographic restenosis. The principal clinical endpoint was a composite Circ J 2007; 71: 1669 -1677 (Received September 19, 2006 revised manuscript received July 5, 2007; accepted July 19, 2007 Although multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that minimal lumen area (min-LA) post (p=0.027), total stent length (p=0.003) and diabetes (p=0.032) were significant independent predictors of restenosis, univariate analysis showed that stent fracture was more common in the restenosis than in the non-restenosis groups (p=0.001).Conclusions Although min-LA post by IVUS, total stent length by QCA and diabetes are independent predictors for angiographic restenosis, stent fracture occurred in 4 lesions (2.4%) and all of them resulted in restenosis (31% of the restenosis). The impact of stent fracture and its potential role in the development of restenosis deserves further study. (Circ J 2007; 71: 1669 -1677)
Background: Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) is proposed as an early biomarker for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but its prognostic value is unclear in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We evaluated the prognostic value of the H-FABP concentration relative to cardiac troponin T (cTnT) in the early hours of ACS. Methods: Serum concentrations of H-FABP and cTnT were measured on admission in 328 consecutive patients hospitalized for ACS within 6 h after the onset of chest pain [AMI, 241 (73.5%) patients; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 154 (47.0%) patients; and emergent coronary angiography within 24 h after admission, 287 (87.5%) patients]. Cardiac events, which were defined as cardiac death or subsequent nonfatal AMI, were monitored for 6 months after admission. Results: During the 6-month follow-up period, there were 25 cardiac events, including 15 cardiac deaths and 10 subsequent nonfatal AMIs. Stepwise multivariate analyses including clinical, electrocardiographic, and biochemical variables revealed that increased H-FABP (above the median of 9.8 g/L), but not increased cTnT (above the median of 0.02 g/L), was independently associated with
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.