Background Aspiration pneumonia is one of the major complications among hospitalized stroke patients, with global incidence ranging from 5–83% and hospital mortality rate of up to 70%. This study aimed to assess the incidence and identify predictors of aspiration pneumonia among stroke patients in Western Amhara region, North-West Ethiopia. Methods An institution-based retrospective follow-up study was conducted on a simple random sample of 568 stroke patients in Western Amhara region admitted at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital. Log binomial regression model, a generalized linear model with log link, was applied to identify significant predictors of aspiration pneumonia. Results Cumulative incidence of aspiration pneumonia among the 568 sampled patients was 23.06%. Males were 1.71 times more at risk to acquire aspiration pneumonia than females (ARR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.07–2.74). Patients with vomiting and dysphagia were at more risk of acquiring aspiration pneumonia as compared with patients without vomiting and dysphagia (ARR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.04–3.14 and ARR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.10–3.48, respectively). Patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis and patients with Glasgow Coma Scale greater than 12 had less risk of acquiring aspiration pneumonia as compared with those who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis and patients with Glasgow Coma Scale less than 8 (ARR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.04–0.28 and ARR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.22–0.94, respectively). Conclusion The cumulative incidence of aspiration pneumonia among sampled patients was 23.06%. Vomiting, dysphagia, antibiotic treatment and Glasgow Coma Scale showed significant correlation with the acquiring of aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, we recommend health-care providers should give special attention for patients with these risk factors to prevent aspiration pneumonia.

The provision of patient-centered care is challenging around the globe, including in Ethiopia. There is a scarcity of information on this issue. Therefore, this study aimed to assess patients' perceptions of patient-centered care and associated factors among patients admitted to public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar city. Methods: A facility-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted from May 8-June 15, 2022. Using a multistage sampling approach, the study participants were selected. An interviewer was used to collect the data. Bi-variable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to analyze the data. Statistical significance was declared using a p value< 0.05. Results: Overall, 53.7% of patients reported poor patient-centered care. And it was higher among public hospitals (66.3%) than private hospitals (40.3%). Length of stay (AOR = 4.2; 95% CI [1.1, 15.3] and AOR = 4.3; 95% CI [1.4, 13]), intimacy with providers (AOR = 2.4; 95% CI [1.2, 4.6] and AOR = 3.9; 95% CI [1.1-9.6]), privacy during care (AOR = 4.2; 95% CI [1.93, 8.9]and AOR=3.3;95% CI: [1.5-7]), easy access to service (AOR=2.76;95% CI [1.33, 5.74] and AOR=3.8;95% CI [1.15, 12.7]) were associated with patient-centered care in public and private hospitals respectively. Awareness of the disease (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI [1.12, 4.8]), information on plans of care (AOR = 4.6; 95% CI [1.9, 10]), and being involved in decisions (AOR = 2.7; 95% CI [1.28, 5.9]) were associated factors in private hospitals. The following factors were associated with the practice of patient-centered care only in public hospitals: residence (AOR = 2.9; 95% CI [1.4, 5.5]), medication information (AOR = 2.88; 95% CI [1.34, 6.2]), and external appearance of hospital (AOR = 2.27; 95% CI [1.04, 4.97]). Conclusion:This study showed that the practice of patient-centered care in public hospitals was poor compared to that in private hospitals. Hence, hospitals should train their staff regarding a culture of patient-centered care in order to deliver high-quality and safer care.