Persistent androgen receptor (AR) transcriptional activity underlies resistance to AR-targeted therapy and progression to lethal castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Recent success in re-targeting persistent AR activity with next-generation androgen/AR axis inhibitors such as enzalutamide (MDV3100) has validated AR as a master regulator during all stages of disease progression. However, resistance to next-generation AR inhibitors limits therapeutic efficacy for many patients. One emerging mechanism of CRPC progression is AR gene rearrangement, promoting synthesis of constitutively-active truncated AR splice variants (AR-Vs) that lack the AR ligand binding domain. In this study, we demonstrate that cells with AR gene rearrangements expressing both full-length and AR-Vs are androgen-independent and enzalutamide-resistant. However, selective knock-down of AR-V expression inhibited androgen-independent growth and restored responsiveness to androgens and antiandrogens. In heterogeneous cell populations, AR gene rearrangements marked individual AR-V-dependent cells that were resistant to enzalutamide. Gene expression profiling following knock-down of full-length AR or AR-Vs demonstrated that AR-Vs drive resistance to AR-targeted therapy by functioning as constitutive and independent effectors of the androgen/AR transcriptional program. Further, mitotic genes deemed previously to be unique AR-V targets were found to be biphasic targets associated with a proliferative level of signaling output from either AR-Vs or androgen-stimulated AR. Overall, these studies highlight AR-Vs as key mediators of persistent AR signaling and resistance to the current arsenal of conventional and next-generation AR-directed therapies, advancing the concept of AR-Vs as therapeutic targets in advanced disease.

Clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) is characterized by VHL inactivation1,2. Because no other gene is mutated as frequently, and VHL mutations are truncal3, VHL inactivation is regarded as the governing event4. VHL loss activates HIF-2, and constitutive HIF-2 restores tumorigenesis in VHL-reconstituted ccRCC cells5. HIF-2 is implicated in angiogenesis and multiple other processes6–9, but angiogenesis is the main target of drugs like sunitinib10. HIF-2, a transcription factor, has been regarded as undruggable11. A structure-based design approach identified a selective HIF-2 antagonist (PT2399) that we evaluate using a tumorgraft (TG)/PDX platform12,13. PT2399 dissociated HIF-2 (an obligatory heterodimer [HIF-2α/HIF-1β])14 in human ccRCC suppressing tumorigenesis in 56% (10/18) lines. PT2399 had greater activity than sunitinib, was active in sunitinib-progressing tumors, and was better tolerated. Unexpectedly, some VHL-mutant ccRCCs were resistant. Resistance occurred despite HIF-2 dissociation in tumors and evidence of Hif-2 inhibition in the mouse as determined by suppression of circulating erythropoietin, a HIF-2 target15 and possible pharmacodynamic marker. We identified a HIF-2-dependent gene signature in sensitive tumors. Illustrating drug specificity, gene expression was largely unaffected by PT2399 in resistant tumors. Sensitive tumors exhibited a distinguishing gene expression signature, and generally higher HIF-2α levels. Prolonged PT2399 treatment led to resistance. We identified a binding site and second site suppressor mutation in HIF-2α and HIF-1β respectively. Both mutations preserved HIF-2 dimers despite treatment with PT2399. Finally, an extensively pretreated patient with a sensitive TG had disease control for >11 months with the close analogue PT2385. We validate HIF-2 as a target in ccRCC, show that some ccRCC are, unexpectedly, HIF-2 independent, and set the stage for biomarker-driven clinical trials.

Reactivation of the androgen receptor (AR) during androgen depletion therapy (ADT) underlies castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPCa). Alternative splicing of the AR gene and synthesis of constitutively-active COOH-terminally truncated AR variants lacking the AR ligand binding domain has emerged as an important mechanism of ADT-resistance in CRPCa. In a previous study, we demonstrated that altered AR splicing in CRPCa 22Rv1 cells was linked to a 35 kb intragenic tandem duplication of AR exon 3 and flanking sequences. In this study, we demonstrate that complex patterns of AR gene copy number imbalances occur in PCa cell lines, xenografts, and clinical specimens. To investigate whether these copy number imbalances reflect AR gene rearrangements that could be linked to splicing disruptions, we carried out a detailed analysis of AR gene structure in the LuCaP 86.2 and CWR-R1 models of CRPCa. By deletion-spanning PCR, we discovered a 8,579 bp deletion of AR exons 5, 6, and 7 in the LuCaP 86.2 xenograft, which provides a rational explanation for synthesis of the truncated AR v567es AR variant in this model. Similarly, targeted re-sequencing of the AR gene in CWR-R1 cells led to the discovery of a 48 kb deletion in AR intron 1. This intragenic deletion marked a specific CWR-R1 cell population with enhanced expression of the truncated AR-V7/AR3 variant, a high level of androgen-independent AR transcriptional activity, and rapid androgen independent growth. Together, these data demonstrate that structural alterations in the AR gene are linked to stable gain-of-function splicing alterations in CRPCa.