The study aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide, a new antiepileptic drug, in rats after intravenous and oral administration at doses of 1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg. Moreover, brain distribution and plasma protein binding were estimated. After intravenous injection, terminal half-life, systemic clearance, and steady state volumes of distribution remained unaltered as a function of dose with values in the range 3.01-3.53 h, 221-241 mL/h/kg and 702-732 mL/kg, respectively. Following oral administration, absolute oral bioavailability was not dose dependent and was at 93.3-106%. However, the time to peak concentration and the dose-normalized peak concentration for 30 mg/kg were significantly different with those for other doses. The extent of urinary excretion of lacosamide was 17.1% and 16.5% for intravenous and oral doses, respectively, whereas fecal excretion was negligible. The brain to plasma ratio of lacosamide was consistent regardless of post-dosing time and the brain to plasma partition coefficient was 0.553. Further, the plasma protein binding of lacosamide was concentration independent with free fraction at 95.9%. Lacosamide showed linear pharmacokinetics at an intravenous dose of 1-30 mg/kg and an oral dose of 1-10 mg/kg but non-linear pharmacokinetics at a 30 mg/kg oral dose.

BackgroundEsomeprazole is an S‐enantiomer of omeprazole that has favorable pharmacokinetics and efficacious acid suppressant properties in humans. However, the pharmacokinetics and effects on intragastric pH of esomeprazole in dogs have not been reported.ObjectiveTo determine the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole administered via various routes (PK study) and to investigate the effect of esomeprazole on intragastric pH with a Bravo pH monitoring system (PD study).AnimalsSeven adult male Beagle dogs and 5 adult male Beagle dogs were used for PK and PD study, respectively.MethodsBoth studies used an open, randomized, and crossover design. In the PK study, 7 dogs received intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SC), and oral doses (PO) of esomeprazole (1 mg/kg). Each treatment period was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. Esomeprazole plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC/MS/MS. In the efficacy study, intragastric pH was recorded without medication (baseline pH) and following IV, SC, and PO esomeprazole dosing regimens (1 mg/kg) in 5 dogs.ResultsThe bioavailability of esomeprazole administered as PO enteric‐coated granules and as SC injections was 71.4 and 106%, respectively. The half‐life was approximately 1 hour. Mean ± SD percent time intragastric pH was ≥3 and ≥4 was 58.9 ± 21.1% and 40.9 ± 17.3% for IV group, 75.8 ± 16.4% and 62.7 ± 17.7% for SC group, 88.2 ± 8.9% and 82.5 ± 7.7% for PO group, and 12.5 ± 3.6% and 3.7 ± 1.8% for baseline. The mean percent time with intragastric pH was ≥3 or ≥4 was significantly increased regardless of the dosing route (P < .05).ConclusionThe PK parameters for PO and SC esomeprazole administration were favorable, and esomeprazole significantly increased intragastric pH after IV, PO, and SC administration. IV and SC administration of esomeprazole might be useful when PO administration is not possible. No significant adverse effects were observed.

No abstract

We characterized the pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide, a novel anti-prostate cancer drug, in rats after intravenous and oral administration in the dose range 0.5-5 mg/kg. Tissue distribution, liver microsomal stability, and plasma protein binding were also examined. After intravenous injection, systemic clearance, volumes of distribution at steady state (Vss), and half-life (T½) remained unaltered as a function of dose, with values in the ranges of 80.4-86.3 mL/h/kg, 1020-1250 mL/kg, and 9.13-10.6 h, respectively. Following oral administration, absolute oral bioavailability was 89.7 % and not dose-dependent. The recoveries of enzalutamide in urine and feces were 0.0620 and 2.04 %, respectively. Enzalutamide was distributed primarily in 10 tissues (brain, liver, kidneys, testis, heart, spleen, lungs, gut, muscle, and adipose) and tissue-to-plasma ratios of enzalutamide ranged from 0.406 (brain) to 10.2 (adipose tissue). Further, enzalutamide was stable in rat liver microsomes, and its plasma protein binding was 94.7 %. In conclusion, enzalutamide showed dose-independent pharmacokinetics at intravenous and oral doses of 0.5-5 mg/kg. Enzalutamide distributed primarily to 10 tissues and appeared to be eliminated primarily by metabolism.

ARV-110, a novel proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC), has been reported to show satisfactory safety and tolerability for prostate cancer therapy in phase I clinical trials. However, there is a lack of bioanalytical assays for ARV-110 determination in biological samples. In this study, we developed and validated an LC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of ARV-110 in rat and mouse plasma and applied it to pharmacokinetic studies. ARV-110 and pomalidomide (internal standard) were extracted from the plasma samples using the protein precipitation method. Sample separation was performed using a C18 column and a mobile phase of 0.1% formic acid in distilled water–0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (30:70, v/v). Multiple reaction monitoring was used to quantify ARV-110 and pomalidomide with ion transitions at m/z 813.4 → 452.2 and 273.8 → 201.0, respectively. The developed method showed good linearity in the concentration range of 2–3000 ng/mL with acceptable accuracy, precision, matrix effect, process efficiency, and recovery. ARV-110 was stable in rat and mouse plasma under long-term storage, three freeze-thaw cycles, and in an autosampler, but unstable at room temperature and 37 °C. Furthermore, the elimination of ARV-110 via phase 1 metabolism in rat, mouse, and human hepatic microsomes was shown to be unlikely. Application of the developed method to pharmacokinetic studies revealed that the oral bioavailability of ARV-110 in rats and mice was moderate (23.83% and 37.89%, respectively). These pharmacokinetic findings are beneficial for future preclinical and clinical studies of ARV-110 and/or other PROTACs.