Background Efficacy of programs for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) that have promoted family members to help with patients’ self-care activities has been largely inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of family-oriented diabetes programs for glycemic control (GC). Methods Electronic literature searches were conducted for clinical trials with a parallel design wherein there were two groups according to whether family members were included (intervention group) or not included (control group) and changes in glycohemoglobin A1C (A1C) were assessed as a study outcome. Each effect size (i.e. difference in A1C change between the intervention and control group) was pooled with a random-effects model. Results There were 31 eligible trials consisting of 1466 and 1415 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Pooled A1C change [95% confidence interval (CI)] was −0.45% (−0.64% to −0.26%). Limiting analyses to 21 trials targeted at patients with type 1 DM or 9 trials targeted at patients with type 2 DM, the pooled A1C changes (95% CI) were −0.35% (−0.55% to −0.14%) and −0.71% (−1.09% to −0.33%), respectively. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that focusing on the family as well as the individual patient in self-management diabetes programs to improve the performance of self-care activities of patients with DM is effective in terms of proper GC.

Purpose To determine the degree of control of multiple risk factors under real-world conditions for coronary artery disease (CAD) according to the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and to determine whether reaching multifactorial targets for blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), HbA1c, and current smoking is associated with lower risks for CAD. Methods We investigated the effects on subsequent CAD of the number of controlled risk factors among BP, LDL-C, HbA1c, and current smoking in a prospective cohort study using a nationwide claims database of 220,894 individuals in Japan. Cox regression examined risks over a 4.8-year follow-up. Results The largest percentage of participants had two risk factors at target in patients with DM (39.6%) and subjects without DM (36.4%). Compared with those who had two targets achieved, the risks of CAD among those who had any one and no target achieved were two and four times greater, respectively, regardless of the presence of DM. The effect of composite control was sufficient to bring CAD risk in patients with DM below that for subjects without DM with any two targets achieved, whereas the risk of CAD in the DM group with all four risk factors uncontrolled was 9.4 times more than in the non-DM group who had achieved two targets. Conclusions These findings show that composite control of modifiable risk factors has a large effect in patients with and without DM. The effect was sufficient to bring CAD risk in patients with DM below that in the non-DM group who had two targets achieved.

Citation: Yamamoto M, Fujihara K, Ishizawa M, et al. Overt proteinuria, moderately reduced eGFR and their combination are predictive of severe diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema in diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:2685-2689. https://doi.org/10.1167 PURPOSE. Since the combined effects of proteinuria and a moderately decreased eGFR on incident severe eye complications in patients with diabetes are still largely unknown, these associations were determined in a large historical cohort of Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS.We evaluated the effects of overt proteinuria (OP) (dipstick 1þ and over) and/or moderately reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (MG) (baseline eGFR 30.0-54.9 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) on the incidence of treatment-required diabetic eye diseases (TRDED). We divided 7709 patients into four groups according to the presence or absence of OP and MG: no OP without MG (NP[MGÀ]), OP without MG (OP[MGÀ]), no OP with MG (NP[MGþ]), and OP with MG (OP[MGþ]). Multivariate Cox analyses were performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals for combinations of the presence and/or absence of OP and MG on the risk of developing TRDED. RESULTS.During the median follow-up period of 5.6 years, 168 patients developed TRDED. HRs for OP and MG for incident TRDED were 1.91 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.87) and 1.90 (1.11-3.23), respectively. HRs for incident TRDED were 1.73 (1.11-2.69) and 5.57 (2.40-12.94) for OP(MGÀ) and OP(MGþ), respectively, in comparison with NP(MGÀ). CONCLUSIONS.In Japanese patients with diabetes, OP and MG were separately as well as additionally associated with higher risks of TRDED. Results indicate the necessity of the simultaneous assessment of proteinuria and eGFR for appropriate evaluation of risks of severe eye complications in patients with diabetes.

No abstract

Background Evidence of the role of systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) in development of severe diabetic retinopathy is not strong, although the adverse effect of low diastolic blood pressure has been a partial explanation. We assessed the predictive ability of incident severe diabetic retinopathy between pulse pressure ( PP ) which considers both SBP and diastolic blood pressure, compared with SBP . Methods and Results Eligible patients (12 242, 83% men) aged 19 to 72 years from a nationwide claims database were analyzed for a median observational 4.8‐year period. Severe diabetic retinopathy was defined as vision‐threatening treatment‐required diabetic eye diseases. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that hazard ratios (95% CI ) of treatment‐required diabetic eye diseases for 1 increment of standard deviation and the top tertile compared with the bottom tertile were 1.39 (1.21–1.60) and 1.72 (1.17–2.51), respectively, for PP and 1.22 (1.05–1.41) and 1.43 (0.97–2.11), respectively, for SBP adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, lipids, and smoking status. In a model with SBP and PP simultaneously as covariates, the hazard ratios of only PP (hazard ratios [95% CI ], 1.57 [1.26–1.96]) but not SBP (0.85 [0.68–1.07]) were statistically significant. Delong test revealed a significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between PP and SBP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% CI ], 0.58 [0.54–0.63] versus 0.54 [0.50–0.59]; P =0.03). The strongest predictor remained as hemoglobin A1c (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% CI ], 0.80 [0.77–0.84]). Conclusions After excluding the significant impact of glycemic control, PP in comparison with SBP is a better predictor of severe diabetic retinopathy, suggesting a role of diastolic blood pressure and arterial stiffness in pathology.