Background: Two-dimensional echocardiography (2D echo) is the most widely used non-invasive imaging modality due to its fast acquisition time, low cost, and high temporal resolution. Boundary identification of left ventricle (LV) in 2D echo, i.e., image segmentation, is the first step to calculate relevant clinical parameters. Currently, LV segmentation in 2D echo is primarily conducted semi-manually. A fully-automatic segmentation of the LV wall needs further development.Methods: We evaluated the performance of the state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the segmentation of 2D echo images from 6 standard projections of the LV. We used two segmentation algorithms: U-net and segAN. The models were trained using an in-house dataset, which consists of 1,649 porcine images from 6 to 8 different pigs. In addition, a transfer learning approach was used for the segmentation of long-axis projections by training models with our database based on the previously trained weights obtained from Cardiac Acquisitions for Multi-structure Ultrasound Segmentation (CAMUS) dataset.The models were tested on a separate set of images from two other pigs by computing several metrics. The segmentation process was combined with a 3D reconstruction framework to quantify the physiological indices such as LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF). Results:The average dice metric for the LV cavity was 0.90 and 0.91 for the U-net and segAN, respectively, which was higher than 0.82 for the level-set (P value: 3.31×10 −25 ). The average Hausdorff distance for the LV cavity was 2.71 mm and 2.82 mm for the U-net and segAN, respectively, which was lower than 3.64 mm for the level-set (P value: 4.86×10 −16 ). The LV shapes and volumes obtained using the CNN segmentation models were in good agreement with the results segmented by the experts. In addition, the differences of the calculated physiological parameters between two 3D reconstruction models segmented by the experts and CNNs were less than 15%. Conclusions:The results showed that both CNN models achieve higher performance on LV segmentation than the level-set method. The error of the reconstruction from automatic segmentation compared to the expert segmentation is less than 15%, which is within the 20% error of echo compared to the gold standard.

Image‐based CFD is a powerful tool to study cardiovascular flows while 2D echocardiography (echo) is the most widely used noninvasive imaging modality for the diagnosis of heart disease. Here, echo is combined with CFD, that is, an echo‐CFD framework, to study ventricular flows. To achieve this, the previous 3D reconstruction from multiple 2D echo at standard cross sections is extended by: (a) reconstructing aortic and mitral valves from 2D echo and closing the left‐ventricle (LV) geometry by approximating a superior wall; (b) incorporating the physiological assumption of the fixed apex as a reference (fixed) point in the 3D reconstruction; and (c) incorporating several smoothing algorithms to remove the nonphysical oscillations (ringing) near the basal section. The method is applied to echo from a baseline LV and one after inducing acute myocardial ischemia (AMI). The 3D reconstruction is validated by comparing it against a reference reconstruction from many echo sections while flow simulations are validated against the Doppler ultrasound velocity measurements. The sensitivity study shows that the choice of the smoothing algorithm does not change the flow pattern inside the LV. However, the presence of the mitral valve can significantly change the flow pattern during the diastole phase. In addition, the abnormal shape of a LV with AMI can drastically change the flow during diastole. Furthermore, the hemodynamic energy loss, as an indicator of the LV pumping performance, for different test cases is calculated, which shows a larger energy loss for a LV with AMI compared to the baseline one.

A serious complication in aortic dissection is dynamic obstruction of the true lumen (TL). Dynamic obstruction results in malperfusion, a blockage of blood flow to vital organs. Clinical data reveal that increases in central blood pressure promote dynamic obstruction. However, the mechanisms by which high pressures result in TL collapse are underexplored and poorly understood. We developed a computational model to investigate biomechanical and hemodynamical factors involved in dynamic obstruction. We hypothesize relatively small pressure gradient between TL and FL are sufficient to displace the flap and induce obstruction. An idealized fluid-structure interaction model of type B aortic dissection was created. Simulations were performed under mean cardiac output, while inducing dynamic changes in blood pressure by altering FL outflow resistance. As FL resistance increased, central aortic pressure increased from 95.7 to 115.3 mmHg. Concurrent with blood pressure increase, flap motion was observed, resulting in TL collapse, consistent with clinical findings. The maximum pressure gradient between TL and FL over the course of the dynamic obstruction was 4.5 mmHg, consistent with our hypothesis. Furthermore, the final stage of dynamic obstruction was very sudden in nature, occurring over a short time(< 1 second) in our simulation, consistent with the clinical understanding of this dramatic event. Simulations also revealed sudden drops in flow and pressure in the TL in response to the flap motion, consistent with first stages of malperfusion. To our knowledge, this study represents the first computational analysis of potential mechanisms driving dynamic obstruction in aortic dissection.

No abstract