Background: The first cases of proved COVID-19 in Iran were reported in February 2020 and has since rapidly spread worldwide. We aimed to clarify the clinical significance of hematologic parameters alteration in COVID-19. Methods: Different hematologic parameters were measured in 225 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care university hospital, during the peak of COVID-19 outbreak and their association with duration of hospitalization, ICU admission and especially mortality was analyzed. Results: Among a total of 225 patients, 24.4% did not survive after admission. Lymphopenia and neutrophilia were observed in 52.7% and 21.4% of the patients, respectively. The mean count of neutrophils was significantly higher in non-survived patients (P = .032). Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly associated with mortality (P < .001). Low hemoglobin (Hb) concentration significantly correlated with mortality (P = .004) and ICU admission (P = .04). Platelet (Plt) count was significantly lower in the non-survived patients (P = .023). Non-survivors had significantly lower nadir Hb and Plt counts than survivors (P < .001 in both parameters). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) also correlated with mortality and was significantly higher in non-survivors (P = .034). Conclusions: Hematologic laboratory parameters have always been a crucial component of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in infectious disease. Hematologic predictors of a fatal outcome in COVID19 hospitalized patients in our series include elevated NLR and PLR, lower than normal Hb and Plt, elevated D-dimer and prolonged prothrombin time (PT), together with elevated inflammatory indicators in the blood.

Background Cancer patients, with an incidence of more than 18 million new cases per year, may constitute a significant portion of the COVID-19 infected population. In the pandemic situation, these patients are considered highly vulnerable to infectious complications due to their immunocompromised state. Material & Methods In this retrospective case series, the documents of solid cancer patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, hospitalized in Shariati hospital between 20 February and 20 April 2020, were evaluated. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was based on laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and/or features of chest CT scan highly suggestive for SARS-CoV-2. Results A total of 33 COVID-19-infected cancer patients were included. Mean age was 63.9 years, and 54.5% of the patients were male. LDH level was significantly higher (1487.5±1392.8 vs. 932.3±324.7 U/L, P-value=0.016) and also serum albumin was significantly lower in non-survivors (3.6±0.5 vs. 2.9±0.6 g/dL, p-value=0.03). Among 16 patients with stage IV cancer, thirteen patients died, which was significantly higher compared to stage I-III cancer patients (81.3% vs. 18.8% P-value= <0.001). In terms of developing complications, sepsis, invasive ventilation and mortality was significantly higher in patients who received cytotoxic chemotherapy within the last 14 days. Conclusion In this study, we showed that the mortality rate among cancer patients affected by COVID-19 was higher than general population and this rate has a significant correlation with factors including the stage of the disease, the type of cancer, the activity of cancer and finally receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy within 14 days before diagnosis of COVID-19.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) currently is the only available curative option for transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Peripheral blood is a more convenient source for HSCT in comparison with bone marrow. Information about the relative success of transplantation with these 2 graft sources would help physicians and patients choose between them. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pros and cons of using peripheral blood instead of bone marrow as the graft source in thalassemia transplantation. We analyzed the transplant results of 567 transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients who received a transplant between 1998 and 2015 considering their stem cell source as a comparative variable. In multivariate Cox analysis the survival advantage for bone marrow compared with peripheral blood was not significant after adjusting for sex, age, and hepatic fibrosis presence. Rejection incidence was significantly lower in patients who used peripheral blood as their graft source. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were more frequent in peripheral blood transplants, but the difference was not statistically significant. This study shows that peripheral blood could be an alternative stem cell source in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT for thalassemia.

Bone marrow transplantation is the only curative treatment for beta-thalassemia major. Data on the co-transplantation of MSCs with HSCs in beta-thalassemia major patients are scarce. We aimed to investigate the outcomes of thalassemia major patients who underwent bone marrow-derived MSC co-transplantation with HSCs compared with those who only received HSCs. This prospective randomized study included patients with class III thalassemia major undergoing HSCT divided randomly into two groups: Thirty-three patients underwent co-transplantation of bone marrow-derived MSCs with HSCs, and 26 patients only received HSCs. Five-year OS, TFS, TRM, graft rejection rate, and GVHD were estimated. The 5-year OS was 66.54% (95% CI, 47.8% to 79.9%) in patients who underwent co-transplantation of MSCs with HSCs vs 76.92% (95% CI, 55.7% to 88.9%) in patients who only received HSCs (P = .54). No significant difference was observed in the 5-year TFS between the two groups (59.1% vs 69.2%; P = .49). The 5-year cumulative incidence of TRM was not statistically significant among patients who underwent co-transplantation of MSCs with HSCs (27.27%) vs those who only received HSCs (19.23%; P = .61). There was no statistically significant difference in graft rejection, acute GvHD, and chronic GvHD between the two groups. Based on our findings, the co-transplantation of MSCs and HSCs to class III thalassemia major patients does not alter their transplantation outcomes including OS, TFS, rejection rate, transplant-related mortality, and GvHD. K E Y W O R D S beta-thalassemia, hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, outcome How to cite this article: Rostami T, Maleki N, Kasaeian A, et al. Co-transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells with hematopoietic stem cells does not improve transplantation outcome in class III beta-thalassemia major: A prospective cohort study with long-term follow-up. Pediatr