In experienced hands, ELC is safe even after 72 hours.

Background/Objectives To evaluate outcomes from all British military patients who underwent eye removal during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Subjects/Methods Retrospective case note review of all patients (n = 19) who had undergone either evisceration or enucleation, on a database of all military patients repatriated to the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham. Results Twenty eye removals were performed on 19 patients, of which 14 (70%) were eviscerations and 6 (30%) were enucleations. Orbital wall fractures were seen in 12 (61%) patients, with orbital floor fractures being the most common. The eye removal was a primary procedure in five of fourteen eviscerations, and five of six enucleations. Complications were seen after four (28.6%) eviscerations patients and two (33.3%) enucleations. Postoperative pain was problematic after three (21.4%) eviscerations but no enucleations. Orbital implants were placed during three of the five primary enucleations, with good outcomes in two. One patient however required implant retrieval and wound washout due to a high risk of infection and communication with the intra-cranial space. Conclusions Evisceration and enucleation are both viable options in the management of severe ocular trauma in military patients. Evisceration and enucleation have similar complication rates and outcomes, and both have low rates of sympathetic ophthalmia. Primary orbital implants can be at high risk in cases with orbital roof fracture, but can provide good outcomes in select patients.

Purpose To evaluate the visual experiences of patients during vitreoretinal surgery under local anaesthesia (LA). Methods Prospective questionnaire survey of 80 patients within 30 min of completion of vitreoretinal surgery under LA. Preoperative visual acuity, surgical procedure and its duration, efficacy of the local block, as well as intraoperative perceptions of flashes, colours, movements, and seeing instruments were documented. Results A sub-Tenon's block was performed in 62/80 (77.5%) and a peribulbar block in the remainder. Overall, 72 (90%) of patients perceived light at some stage during their surgery. Of these, 51 (70.83%) observed movements, 45 (62.5%) saw colours, 38 (52.77%) saw instruments, and 24 (33.33%) saw flashes. The commonest observations were colourful swirls, black pipes, and the colour red. Most patients found these experiences pleasant or bearable; two found them frightening, and four would like to have been warned preoperatively about them. Preoperative visual acuity, diagnosis, gender of the patient, degree of akinesia, and the duration of surgery did not associate with visual perceptions. Logistic regression analysis showed that younger people were more likely to experience flashing lights (P ¼ 0.03) and to see instruments (P ¼ 0.04), patients having a sub-Tenon's block to perceive light (P ¼ 0.005), and those who did not receive awake sedation were more likely to see instruments (P ¼ 0.04). Conclusions Visual experiences are common during vitreoretinal surgery undertaken under LA. Where appropriate, patients should be forewarned about these experiences and reassured that they are not normally frightening.

Objective: To evaluate the success for gender selection using a sample of semen separated by a modified swim-up technique. Design: We retrospectively compared the gender outcome of two treatments (A and B) for either a male or female offspring with those who conceived spontaneously. Setting: Private practice of one author (M.A.K.). Patients, Participants: The treatment groups consisted of 52 total pregnancies for couples who conceived by the separation technique. Of these 52 participants, 15 desired a female offspring and were placed into treatment A and 37 desired a male offspring and were placed into treatment B. The control groups consisted of 162 women who were presented with initial consultation for gender selection and conceived spontaneously. Control group A consisted of 80 women who initially chose a female offspring, and control group B consisted of 82 participants who initially chose a male. Interventions: In treatment group A, one timed intrauterine insemination (IUI) was carried out with the bottom 0.5 ml of the separated semen on cycle days 12–14, when the follicle was 18–22 mm. Patients in this group were also administered clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin. In treatment group B, one timed IUI was done with the top 0.5 ml of the separated semen, when the follicle was 18–22 mm. Main Outcome Measure: The gender outcome of the pregnancies of two treatment and control groups was evaluated based on the known desired gender. Results: The success rate for conceiving a female child after intervention (treatment group A) was 86.7% effective (p = 0.002) as compared to the control group A. Couples seeking a male child (treatment group B) were 89.2% effective (p = 0.0002) as compared to the control group B. Conclusions: This study reveals that the modified swim-up method with additional monitoring results in statistically significant gender preselection.

We report the presentation, diagnosis, and management of endophthalmitis caused by the opportunistic Prevotella species. The case was referred to us following uneventful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Accurate identification of this rare cause of endophthalmitis was made using bacterial polymerase chain reaction DNA sequencing. Subsequent prompt modification of antibacterial therapy allowed resolution of signs and symptoms and significant visual recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of diagnosis and management of post-cataract-surgery endophthalmitis caused by the opportunistic Prevotella species.