In many parts of the world, mostly low-and middle-income countries, timely diagnosis and repair of congenital heart diseases (CHDs) is not feasible for a variety of reasons. In these regions, economic growth has enabled the development of cardiac units that manage patients with CHD presenting later than would be ideal, often after the window for early stabilisation -transposition of the great arteries, coarctation of the aorta -or for lower-risk surgery in infancy -left-to-right shunts or cyanotic conditions. As a result, patients may have suffered organ dysfunction, manifest signs of pulmonary vascular disease, or the sequelae of profound cyanosis and polycythaemia. Late presentation poses unique clinical and ethical challenges in decision making regarding operability or surgical candidacy, surgical strategy, and perioperative intensive care management.

Background Handoff in cardiac intensive care units has been associated with improved outcomes. We aimed to determine whether a standardized protocol for handover could be implemented using the “theory of change” model by education, introduction of a checklist, and developing feedback mechanisms, measured by better knowledge transfer and bedside care provider satisfaction. Methods A theory of change model was developed and implemented to introduce a teamwork-driven handover process. A standardized checklist was made available at every bedside. A preintervention assessment of patient handovers was obtained by direct observation using a standardized checklist. The same checklist was used for assessment after implementation. A survey was conducted to measure intensive care unit staff perception and satisfaction with the handover process. Results After implementation, the standardized handover process was employed in 53 of 60 patient transfers (88.3% compliance): 49 preintervention and 29 postintervention observations were performed. Postimplementation, critical knowledge omissions (total score of 25) decreased from a median of 10 (range 4–17) to 0 (range 0–4; p < 0.001). At 6 months, knowledge omission scores improved to a median of 0 (range 0–1; p < 0.001); and 96% (24/25) of staff reported improvement in the quality of information transfer, and 100% reported improvement in overall team work. Conclusion Implementation of a standardized patient handover process improved the quality of knowledge transfer and overall staff satisfaction. The theory of change model is a unique and highly effective tool to implement and sustain behavior change.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the utility of the Cardiac Children’s Hospital Early Warning Score (C-CHEWS) in the early detection of deterioration. DESIGN: Single-center longitudinal pilot study. SETTING: Pediatric cardiac ICU (PCICU), Aga Khan University. INTERVENTIONS: C-CHEWS and Inadequate Oxygen Delivery (IDO 2 ) Index calculation every 2 hours. PATIENTS: A total of 60 children (0 d to 18 yr old). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A single-center longitudinal pilot study was conducted at PCICU. All postoperative extubated patients were assessed and scored between 0 and 11, and these scores were then correlated with the IDO 2 index data available from the T3 platform. Adverse events were defined as a need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or reintubation, and death. A total of 920 C-CHEWS and IDO 2 scores were analyzed on 60 patients during the study period. There were 36 males and 24 females, and the median age of the study population was 34 months (interquartile range, 9.0–72.0 mo). Fourteen patients (23.3%) developed adverse events; these included 9 reintubations and 5 cardiopulmonary arrests, resulting in 2 deaths. The area under the curve (AUC) for C-CHEWS scores fell in an acceptable range of 0.956 (95% CI, 0.869–0.992), suggesting an optimal accuracy for identifying early warning signs of cardiopulmonary arrest. Whereas, IDO 2 showed no discriminatory power to detect the adverse events with an AUC of 0.522 (95% CI, 0.389–0.652). CONCLUSIONS: The C-CHEWS tool provides a standardized assessment and approach to deteriorating congenital cardiac surgery patients in recognizing early postoperative deterioration.

No abstract

No abstract