The sleep of 15 adult subjects who reported heightened generalized anxiety in the absence of other psychiatric syndromes and a 15-adult contrast group were studied by means of nocturnal polysomnography. Analysis of polysomnography variables revealed a significant discriminant function that accounted for 79% of the variance between groups, indicating that high-anxiety/worry subjects took longer to fall asleep, had a smaller percentage of deep (slow-wave) sleep, and more frequent transitions into light sleep [stage 1 nonrapid eye movement (NREM)]. Additional analyses indicated that high-anxiety/worry subjects had a greater percentage of light sleep, more early microarousals, a lower rapid eye movement (REM) density relative to low-anxiety subjects. These subjects also showed more electrodermal storming when slow-wave sleep and REM sleep variables were covaried. Results indicated disrupted sleep depth and continuity similar to that documented in clinical anxiety disorder patients and distinct from that of depressed patients. These results indicate that generalized anxiety and worry in otherwise healthy individuals may act to produce a clinically significant sleep disturbance in the absence of other psychiatric symptoms.

This investigation compared progressive muscle relaxation plus cognitive distraction (PMR/CD), hypothesized to better improve sleep onset, versus sleep restriction and stimulus control (SR/SC), hypothesized to better improve sleep maintenance, versus a flurazepam (Dalmane) positive contrast condition (MED) and a sleep hygiene education minimal treatment control condition (SHE). Participants with chronic insomnia (N = 53), completed 2 baseline weeks of sleep diaries, and were randomly assigned to a treatment group for 2 more weeks. In the second phase, PMR/CD participants were assigned to 2 weeks of PMR/CD + SR/SC + SHE while SHE participants continued SHE. Results indicated that PMR/CD had greater effect upon sleep onset than SR/SC and SHE, SR/SC had greater effect on sleep maintenance than PMR/CD, and MED was better than the other treatments. In the second phase, the treatment package produced modest additional improvements and SHE performed superior to expectations.

Four hundred and sixty nine patients were randomized to receive either 12 micrograms bd of eformoterol (Oxis, Astra Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kings Langley, U.K.) delivered via Turbohaler or 50 micrograms bd salmeterol (Serevent, Glaxo-Wellcome Ltd., Uxbridge, U.K.) via either the Accuhaler (Glaxo-Wellcome Ltd.) or pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI, Glaxo-Wellcome Ltd.) for 8 weeks. This was followed by a 4-week cross-over period when patients who had received salmeterol in the previous 8 weeks were given eformoterol and patients who had received eformoterol were given either salmeterol via the Accuhaler or pMDI to assess patient device and treatment preference. For the primary efficacy variable, the increase in peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate from run-in to 8 weeks, similar significant improvements were seen in all three treatment groups. Eformoterol Turbohaler (FT) achieved a greater increase in morning PEF than salmeterol Accuhaler (SA) from randomisation to 4 weeks; the increase shown in the eformoterol Turbohaler group was 28.9 1 min-1 compared to 19.91 min-1 for the salmeterol Accuhaler group. The addition of eformoterol Turbohaler 12 micrograms bd, to patients' existing asthma therapy was found to have a significantly more beneficial effect on the severity of patients' daytime asthma symptoms than had salmeterol Accuhaler 50 micrograms bd (P = 0.014). Eformoterol Turbohaler reduced the severity of daytime asthma symptoms by 42% after only 4 weeks of treatment. The patients in the eformoterol Turbohaler treated group experienced a higher percentage of days when they were symptom-free and did not use their short-acting bronchodilator to relieve symptoms (32.8, 24.1 and 28.0% in the FT, SA and SM groups, respectively). At 8 weeks there were no significant differences in any of these variables between the three groups. Patients in all the treatment groups gained an additional 1-1.5 nights undisturbed by asthma per week. The changes in sleep disturbance were not significantly different between the three treatment groups. In addition to the therapeutic benefits provided by eformoterol Turbohaler the device (Turbohaler) was the significant preference of patients given both Turbohaler and pMDI (P = 0.0168) and was also considered to be significantly more convenient to carry around than the Accuhaler (P < 0.0001). No other differences were found between the three devices. The results of this study demonstrate that the addition of a long-acting beta 2-agonist is an effective tool for achieving the goals of asthma treatment. Eformoterol via the Turbohaler is at least as effective as salmeterol via either the Accuhaler or the pMDI in achieving these goals.

Sleep deprivation can impair alertness and cognitive and motor performance. We hypothesized that the amino acid tyrosine might reduce deleterious effects of sleep deprivation. Seventy-six healthy males, age 18-35 years, participated in a four-day protocol that included a habituation night, a baseline night, a 40.5 h period without sleep, and a recovery night. Tyrosine 150 mg/kg, caffeine 300 mg/70 kg, phentermine 37.5 mg, D-amphetamine 20 mg and placebo were administered in a double-blind, randomized fashion to compare their effects on the time it took to fall asleep, on endocrine responses during sleep deprivation, and on sleep quantity, quality and architecture as measured by polysomnography during recovery sleep. When given after 36 h without sleep, tyrosine had no significant effect on any parameter of sleep. D-amphetamine produced marked decrease in sleep drive but caused deleterious effects on many aspects of recovery sleep. Still, D-amphetamine was associated with increased alertness on the first recovery day. Phentermine and caffeine both decreased sleep drive during sleep deprivation, but phentermine impaired rapid-eye-movement (REM) recovery sleep. Tyrosine (when compared to placebo) had no effect on any sleep related measure, but it did stimulate prolactin release.