Recent transcriptome analysis indicates that >90% of human genes undergoes alternative splicing, underscoring the contribution of differential RNA processing to diverse proteomes in higher eukaryotic cells. The polypyrimidine tract binding protein PTB is a well-characterized splicing repressor, but PTB knockdown causes both exon inclusion and skipping. Genome-wide mapping of PTB-RNA interactions and construction of a functional RNA map now revealed that dominant PTB binding near a competing constitutive splice site generally induces exon inclusion whereas prevalent binding close to an alternative site often causes exon skipping. This positional effect was further demonstrated by disrupting or creating a PTB binding site on minigene constructs and testing their responses to PTB knockdown or overexpression. These findings suggest a mechanism for PTB to modulate splice site competition to produce opposite functional consequences, which may be generally applicable to RNA binding splicing factors to positively or negatively regulate alternative splicing in mammalian cells.
The U2AF heterodimer has been well studied for its role in defining functional 3′ splice sites in pre-mRNA splicing, but many fundamental questions still remain unaddressed regarding the function of U2AF in mammalian genomes. Through genome-wide analysis of U2AF-RNA interactions, we report that U2AF has the capacity to directly define ~88% of functional 3′ splice sites in the human genome, but numerous U2AF binding events also occur in intronic locations. Mechanistic dissection reveals that upstream intronic binding events interfere with the immediate downstream 3′ splice site associated either with the alternative exon, to cause exon skipping, or with the competing constitutive exon, to induce exon inclusion. We further demonstrate partial functional impairment with leukemia-associated mutations in U2AF35, but not U2AF65, in regulated splicing. These findings reveal the genomic function and regulatory mechanism of U2AF in both normal and disease states.
Background: Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) was discovered half a century ago as a cardiomyopathy with excessive trabeculation and a thin ventricular wall. In the decades since, numerous studies have demonstrated that LVNC primarily impacts left ventricles (LVs), and is often associated with LV dilation and dysfunction. However, owing in part to the lack of suitable mouse models that faithfully mirror the selective LV vulnerability in patients, mechanisms underlying susceptibility of LV to dilation and dysfunction in LVNC remain unknown. Genetic studies have revealed that deletions and mutations in PRDM16 cause LVNC, but previous conditional Prdm16 knockout mouse models do not mirror the LVNC phenotype in patients, and importantly, the underlying molecular mechanisms by which PRDM16 deficiency causes LVNC are still unclear. Methods: Prdm16 cardiomyocyte (CM)-specific knockout ( Prdm16 cKO ) mice were generated and analyzed for cardiac phenotypes. RNA sequencing and ChIP sequencing were performed to identify direct transcriptional targets of PRDM16 in CMs. Single cell RNA sequencing in combination with Spatial Transcriptomics were employed to determine CM identity at single cell level. Results: CM-specific ablation of Prdm16 in mice caused LV-specific dilation and dysfunction, as well as biventricular noncompaction, which fully recapitulated LVNC in patients. Mechanistically, PRDM16 functioned as a compact myocardium-enriched transcription factor, which activated compact myocardial genes while repressing trabecular myocardial genes in LV compact myocardium. Consequently, Prdm16 cKO LV compact myocardial CMs shifted from their normal transcriptomic identity to a transcriptional signature resembling trabecular myocardial CMs and/or neurons. Chamber-specific transcriptional regulation by PRDM16 was in part due to its cooperation with LV-enriched transcription factors Tbx5 and Hand1. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that disruption of proper specification of compact CM may play a key role in the pathogenesis of LVNC. They also shed light on underlying mechanisms of LV-restricted transcriptional program governing LV chamber growth and maturation, providing a tangible explanation for the susceptibility of LV in a subset of LVNC cardiomyopathies.
Background: Membrane contact sites are fundamental for transmission and translation of signals in multicellular organisms. The junctional membrane complexes in the cardiac dyads, where transverse (T) tubules are juxtaposed to the sarcoplasmic reticulum, are a prime example. T-tubule uncoupling and remodeling are well-known features of cardiac disease and heart failure. Even subtle alterations in the association between T-tubules and the junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum can cause serious cardiac disorders. NEXN (nexilin) has been identified as an actin-binding protein, and multiple mutations in the NEXN gene are associated with cardiac diseases, but the precise role of NEXN in heart function and disease is still unknown. Methods: Nexn global and cardiomyocyte-specific knockout mice were generated. Comprehensive phenotypic and RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry analyses were performed. Heart tissue samples and isolated single cardiomyocytes were analyzed by electron and confocal microscopy. Results: Global and cardiomyocyte-specific loss of Nexn in mice resulted in a rapidly progressive dilated cardiomyopathy. In vivo and in vitro analyses revealed that NEXN interacted with junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum proteins, was essential for optimal calcium transients, and was required for initiation of T-tubule invagination and formation. Conclusions: These results demonstrated that NEXN is a pivotal component of the junctional membrane complex and is required for initiation and formation of T-tubules, thus providing insight into mechanisms underlying cardiomyopathy in patients with mutations in NEXN .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.