Advanced age was not related to negative outcomes after kidney transplantation, after excluding recipient death as a cause of allograft loss. Higher mortality rate in this group was associated to a higher frequency of comorbidities, especially diabetes mellitus.
BackgroundVisceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important and potentially fatal neglected tropical disease. The aim of this study was to investigate hyponatremia and risk factors for death among VL patients.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study with VL patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Northeast Brazil, from 2002 to 2009. Patients were divided into two groups: non-survivors and survivors. Hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium < 135 mEq/L. A logistic regression model was done to investigate risk factors for death.ResultsA total of 285 VL patients were included, with mean age 37 ± 15 years, and 74% were males. Thirty-four patients died (11.9%). Non-survivors had a significantly higher prevalence of dyspnea (38.2 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.003), pulmonary crackles (11.8 vs. 4.0%, p = 0.049), dehydration (23.5 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.033), oliguria (8.8 vs. 0.8%, p = 0.001) and jaundice (47.1 vs. 14.3%, p < 0.001). They also presented higher prevalence of hyponatremia (41.9 vs. 24.1%, p = 0.035), thrombocytopenia (91.2 vs. 65.3%, p = 0.002) and severe hypoalbuminemia (78.3 vs. 35.3%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, moderate/severe hyponatremia (OR = 2.278, 95% CI = 1.046–4.962), thrombocytopenia (OR = 5.482, 95% CI = 1.629–18.443), jaundice (OR = 5.133, 95% CI = 1.793–14.696) and severe hypoalbuminemia (OR = 6.479, 95% CI = 2.124–19.766) were predictors of death.ConclusionHigher prevalence of dehydration, oliguria, pulmonary symptoms and liver involvement was found in non-survivors VL patients. Hypoalbuminemia and hyponatremia were frequent and significantly associated with mortality.
Within this short period of observation, our study was unable to detect any significant difference in major transplant outcomes comparing CNI and ST elimination strategies.
Everolimus is an immunosuppressive agent used for the prophylaxis of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. Everolimus inhibits the activity of the serine/threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a key enzyme that controls cell growth and metabolism, producing cell cycle arrest from the G1 to S phase. As a consequence, everolimus has antiproliferative and antineoplastic effects. Everolimus is a drug with a narrow therapeutic index. The pharmacokinetics of everolimus indicates a need for twice-daily dosing. Intra-and interindividual variability and drug-drug interactions suggest the need for therapeutic drug monitoring to maximize the efficacy/toxicity ratio. The good correlation between exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) and trough concentration indicates that monitoring of everolimus trough concentrations is an adequate strategy after kidney transplantation. Everolimus is indicated for low-to moderate-risk de novo kidney transplant candidates. There are no conclusive studies thus far indicating that everolimus can be used in high-risk patients, such as sensitized patients, retransplants, and African Americans. In de novo kidney transplant recipients, the recommended initial dose of everolimus is 0.75 mg twice daily, adjusted to maintain blood trough concentrations of 3-8 ng/mL, in combination with progressive reduction in blood trough cyclosporine concentrations to 25-50 ng/mL. In combination with reduced trough blood tacrolimus concentrations of 4-7 ng/mL the recommended initial dose of everolimus is 1.5 mg twice daily, adjusted to maintain trough blood concentrations of 3-8 ng/mL. Everolimus can also be used as a conversion strategy, mainly to preserve renal function and to manage patients with malignancy. There is no definition of the ideal strategy for conversion, ie, abrupt or sequential, initial dose of everolimus, or target therapeutic trough blood concentrations. Intensive monitoring is recommended after conversion, especially for acute rejection and proteinuria. Because mTOR is ubiquitous and central to many intracellular processes, an array of adverse reactions may occur, including delayed tissue regeneration, proteinuria, dyslipidemia, diabetes, myelosuppression, infertility, ovarian cysts, and mouth ulcers. Because long-term benefits are the goal of any immunosuppressive strategy, further investigations aiming to understand, prevent, and manage everolimus-related adverse reactions are necessary to mitigate the risks and improve tolerability, allowing maximization of all the benefits of this drug.
Introduction: Induction therapy has been used in sensitized patients, re-transplants, and in patients who have high risk to delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation. Methods: Retrospective study with aim to compare transplant endpoints between recipients of deceased donors which have received induction with alemtuzumab (n = 9) versus thymoglobulin (n = 18). Patients were matched for age, duration of dialysis treatment and cold ischemia time. Results: There were no differences at demographic characteristics. All patients received kidney grafts from deceased donors and 67% of these donors met the expanded criteria. The incidence of DFG was similar in alemtuzumab and thymoglobulin groups, 55% and 56%. At 12 months, rates of rejection free survival (67% versus 89%, p = 0,13), graft survival (62,5% versus 76,6%; p = 0,73), graft with death censored (62,5% versus 76,6%; p = 0,82) and patient survival (83,3% versus 81,2%; p = 0,63) were similar between the two groups. Viral infections and renal function were similar between groups. At the end of the first month, alemtuzumab patients displayed a fewer lymphocyte number (135 ± 78 versus 263 ± 112 N/mm 3 , p < 0,05) followed by a more rapid recovery after 3 months (day 90: 683 ± 367 versus 282 ± 72 N/mm 3 ; p < 0,05). Cost associated with alemtuzumab and thymoglobulin inductions therapies were R$ 1,388.00 and R$ 7,398.00. Conclusion: In this cohort of patients, alemtuzumab induction showed efficacy and safety comparable to thymoglobulin but with significant cost reduction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.