Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) associated with rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonitis (RPIP) frequently has a poor prognosis and optimal treatment is not well defined. Here, we report a 62-year-old Japanese man with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive ADM associated with RPIP presented with progressive shortness of breath, Heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules, arthralgia, and fatigue but no sign of muscle weakness. Laboratory investigation revealed serum levels of the following biomarkers: ferritin, 1393 ng/mL; Krebs von der Lungen-6, 1880 U/mL; and creatine kinase, 85 U/L. Computed tomography (CT) images showed diffuse ground-glass opacity in both lung fields. Because anti-MDA5 was positive, we made a diagnosis of ADM associated with RPIP and initiated treatment. Following five courses of combination therapy with prednisolone, cyclosporine A, and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), IVCY treatment was switched to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg) because of the reactivation of interstitial pneumonia with an increased serum ferritin level. Additional treatment with IVIg improved RPIP, with normalization of anti-ADM antibody levels. Therefore, IVIg mayt be a new candidate treatment for anti-MDA5 antibody-positive ADM associated with RPIP.
Reactive arthritis (ReA) is a sterile arthritis that occurs in genetically predisposed individuals secondary to an extra-articular infection, usually of the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract. Sterile arthritis associated with instillation of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (iBCG) therapy used for bladder cancer can also be included under ReA based on the pathogenic mechanism. Similar to spondyloarthritis, HLA-B27 positivity is a known contributor to the genetic susceptibility underlying iBCGassociated ReA. Other genetic factors, such as HLA-B39 and HLA-B51, especially in Japanese patients, can also be involved in the pathophysiology of iBCG-associated ReA. The frequencies of ReA-and ReA-related symptoms are slightly different between Japanese and Western studies. Proper understanding of possible complications, their epidemiology and pathogenesis, and their management is important for the rheumatologist when noting symptomatic patients using iBCG. Herein, we will review the most current information on ReA after iBCG therapy.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abatacept over 52 weeks in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate disease activity in the prospective, 5-year, observational study (ORIGAMI study) in Japan.
Methods
Abatacept 125 mg was administered subcutaneously once a week. Clinical outcomes included Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission at Week 52 (primary endpoint), Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ), EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D), treatment retention, and safety. Results were compared with those of csDMARD controls from the ongoing Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) registry.
Results
Overall, 325 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 66.9±12.7 years. The proportion of patients achieving SDAI remission (≤3.3) at Week 52 was 18.9% (95% CI: 14.3–23.6) and low disease activity (≤11) was 53.3% (95% CI: 47.4–59.1). A significant improvement was observed in J-HAQ and EQ-5D over 52 weeks in both the abatacept and csDMARD groups. The probability of abatacept treatment retention at Week 52 was 69.9% (95% CI: 64.7–75.5). AEs and serious AEs were reported in 50.0% and 12.1% of patients, respectively.
Conclusions
Abatacept significantly improved disease activity, physical disability, and quality of life for up to 52 weeks in RA patients in a real-world setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.