The use of carbon dioxide gas warmed to body temperature to produce a pneumoperitoneum during short-term laparoscopic surgery has no clinically important effect.

No abstract

Background: His-bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological form of pacing. Although high capture thresholds are common, few predictors of low HBP threshold have been determined. We aimed to identify electrophysiological predictors. Methods: Fifty-one patients (53% with atrioventricular block) underwent HBP for bradycardia with an intrinsic QRS duration of <120 ms. Attempts to anchor the HBP lead were guided by unipolar His-bundle electrograms (HB EGMs) recorded with an electrophysiology recording system. Patients were followed-up for >6 months. Results: In total, 153 attempts at anchoring the HBP lead were made, of which, 45 achieved acceptable HBP thresholds (≤2.5 V at 1 ms). The amplitude of negative deflection in HB EGM and the selective HBP form at fixation were independently associated with achieving an acceptable threshold. A negative amplitude of ≥0.060 mV in HB EGM was determined as the optimal value for identifying the acceptable threshold. This deep negative HB EGM was recorded with an HBP threshold of 1.4±1.3 V (in 34 attempts), significantly lower than that of positive HB EGM without deep negative deflection (2.8±1.3 V, in 31 trials; or >5 V, in 38 trials). The permanent HBP lead remained with deep negative (≥0.060 mV) or positive HB EGMs in 28 and 14 patients, respectively, and with positive or negative HB injury current in 19 and 23 patients, respectively. During follow-up, increased HBP threshold of >1 V was significantly more prevalent in the positive HB EGM group. The HBP thresholds of deep negative HB EGM and HB injury current, but not of the selective HBP group, were significantly lower than the other subgroups during follow-up. Conclusions: Deep negative HB EGM at fixation was associated with an excellent short-term HBP threshold, similar to HB injury current. Analysis of unipolar HB EGM postfixation may enable prediction of permanent HBP threshold.

Introduction Multisurface pacemapping may help identify the surface of interest in scar‐related ventricular tachycardia (VT). This study aimed to investigate the performance of pacemap parameters for detecting critical sites through multisurface mapping. Methods and Results In 26 patients who underwent scar‐related VT ablation, pacemap parameters including a matching score, the difference between the longest and shortest stimulus‐QRS intervals (Δs‐QRS), and the distance between the good pacemap sites were measured. The parameters were compared between surfaces with and without critical sites and ablation outcomes. A total of 941 pacemap at 56 surfaces targeting 35 VTs were analyzed. A greater Δs‐QRS (40 vs. 8 ms, p < .001) and longer distance between two good pacemap sites (24 vs. 13 mm, p < .001) were observed on the surfaces with critical sites. A similar trend was seen in multisurface pacemapping for the same VTs (52 vs. 18 ms in Δs‐QRS, p = .021; 37 vs. 12 mm in distance, p = .019), although the best pacemap scores were comparable (94 vs. 87, p = .295). The Δs‐QRS > 20 ms and the distance >19 mm showed high positive likelihood ratios (19.8 and 6.1, respectively) for discriminating the surface harboring the critical site. Ablation of VTs fulfilling these parameters was successful on the surfaces, but without the required multisurface ablation. Conclusion Temporal (Δs‐QRS) and spatial (distance) parameters for good pacemap match sites were excellent markers for detecting the surface harboring critical sites in scar‐related VT. A multisurface pacemapping can successfully identify the surface of interest.

No abstract