Although the lower lobectomy implies greater resection than the upper lobectomy, lung function after lower lobectomy was not inferior to that after upper lobectomy because the compensatory response appeared more robust after lower lobectomy.

Background One of the causes of patient dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is leg length discrepancy (LLD). Even when radiographic LLD (R-LLD) is within 5 mm, some people perceive the affected side to be longer, while others perceive it is shorter. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between perceived LLD (P-LLD), R-LLD, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) after THA. Methods A retrospective study of 164 patients with unilateral hip disease was conducted. Based on P-LLD after THA, they were classified into three categories: perceived short (PS 21 patients), no LLD (PN 121 patients), and perceived long (PL 22 patients). On the other hand, based on R-LLD after THA, they were divided into <  − 5 mm (RS 36 patients), − 5 mm ≤ x < 5 mm (RN 99 patients), and 5 mm ≥ (RL 29 patients), respectively. The proportion of P-LLD in the RN group was also evaluated. In each group, the relationship between P-LLD, R-LLD and FJS-12 was investigated. Results After THA, the PL group had significantly worse FJS-12 (PS: 68.3 ± 26.2, PN: 75.0 ± 20.9, PL: 47.3 ± 25.2, P < .0001). In the R-LLD evaluation, there was no difference in FJS-12 among the three groups (RS: 73.7 ± 21.1, RN: 70.0 ± 24.5, RL: 67.7 ± 25.4, P < .53). The RN group perceived leg length to be longer (RN-PL) in 12.1% of cases, and the RN-PL groups had significantly worse FJS-12 (RN-PS: 65.4 ± 24.8, RN-PN: 73.8 ± 23.1, RN-PL: 41.8 ± 27.6, P < .0001). Conclusion One year after THA, patients with longer P-LLD had worse FJS-12, even if the R-LLD was less than 5 mm.

A fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stem such as Corail stem, that compacts the cancellous bone around the stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA), is reported to have good long-term results for more than 20 years. Although various fully HA-coated stems have being used recently, it is unclear whether there are differences in the postoperative outcomes. In this study, 224 patients (234 hips) with THA using either the Corail collarless stem or the Hydra stem were enrolled. And then we performed a retrospective comparison of the data at 2 years postoperatively using propensity score matching analysis. The postoperative modified Harris hip scores in 84 hips each group were 93.6 ± 8.2 points in the Corail group and 92.8 ± 10.1 points in the Hydra group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. However, there was significantly less stem subsidence and rate of 3rd degree or greater stress shielding in the Corail group. Although these two stems were similar collarless fully HA-coated stems and clinical outcomes were favorable results in both groups at 2 years postoperatively, radiographic evaluations showed statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Objective: During proximal femoral nailing, deep femoral artery injury, a rare condition, is often missed and found late, leading to intractable complications such as false aneurysm, hematoma, and anemia. We aimed to determine the novel indicators of the high-risk vertical range and axial angle for deep femoral artery injury that can be easily confirmed intraoperatively using fluoroscopy for hip fracture. Methods: In a single hospital, the lower extremity computed tomography angiographies of 88 patients (50 men and 38 women) were analyzed. A reference plane was defined as the femoral neck and shaft on the same straight line in the lateral view. Reference points were the lower end of the lesser trochanter and distal femur at 140 mm from the tip of the greater trochanter. To determine the high-risk angle for deep femoral artery injury based on the reference plane, the angle from the reference plane to the deep femoral artery (bone–arterial angle) and the shortest distance between the surfaces of the femur and the deep femoral artery (bone–artery distance) were measured at the lesser trochanter and the greater trochanter. We analyzed the bone–arterial angle and bone–artery distance values, their differences among the sexes, and their correlation with body height and body weight. Results: Overall, in the lesser trochanter, the mean bone–arterial angle and bone–artery distance were 19.2° ± 8.0° and 22.9 ± 4.7 mm, respectively. In the greater trochanter, the mean bone–arterial angle and bone–artery distance were –33.9° ± 17.0° and 11.3 ± 4.1 mm, respectively. The mean bone–artery distance of the lesser trochanter was significantly longer in men than in women (24.1 ± 4.5 mm and 21.4 ± 4.5 mm, respectively, P < 0.01), and for the lesser trochanter, positive correlations were found between body height and both bone–arterial angle and bone–artery distance ( r = 0.373, P < 0.001; and r = 0.456, P < 0.0001, respectively), with body weight and bone–artery distance positively correlated ( r = 0.367, P < 0.001). At the greater trochanter, there were negative correlations between body height and bone–arterial angle ( r = –0.5671, P < 0.0001), body weight, and bone–arterial angle ( r = –0.338, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The knowledge of our reference plane and high-risk angles and distances allows surgeons to minimize the risk of deep femoral artery injury. These are easily confirmed intraoperatively using fluoroscopy, allowing surgeons to avoid maneuvering in the deep femoral artery range. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Diagnostic Study

No abstract