BACKGROUND: The subjective postural vertical (SPV) is affected by training that requires participants to maintain balance; training to achieve sitting balance may also help SPV recovery and activities of daily living (ADLs). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the medium-term effects of balance training on the postural vertical (PV) and ADLs in patients with stroke. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with stroke were enrolled in this randomized crossover trial. The outcomes were SPV, SPV with eyes opened (SPV-EO), and the Functional Independent Measure (FIM) after the 14-day intervention of experimental or control training. Experimental training consisted of a maximum lateral truncal tilt to the paretic side at 0.25 Hz with or without a 10° wedge, repeated 60 times. Repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance was performed with two factors: intervention and the intervention period. RESULTS: There was no interaction between the control condition and the PV, but there was interaction between the intervention period and using a wedge for SPV variability errors. FIM showed an interaction between the intervention period and the use of a wedge. CONCLUSIONS: Balance training while sitting with a wedge significantly improved the SPV and FIM. This improved cognition and perception, which facilitate difficult dynamic tasks in ADLs.

Introduction: Clarifications regarding the recovery process of the subjective postural vertical (SPV) and activities of daily living in stroke patients are required to help clinicians determine treatment plans. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of the longitudinal recovery process of SPV and activities of daily living after stroke.Methods: Overall, 109 patients with stroke were enrolled. Clinical assessments included the SPV and total functional independence measure (FIM), initially and after 1 month. The mean and standard deviation of SPV indicated the directional and variability errors, respectively. Participants were categorized as follows: nondeviation group comprised directional and variability errors within the standard values, deviation of variability errors group comprised directional errors within the standard value and variability errors greater than the standard value, and deviation of both directional and variability errors group comprised directional and variability errors greater than the standard values. In addition, a two-way analysis of variance was performed for initial pre-and post-SPV, and pre-and posttotal FIM scores (p < .05). Results:The deviation of variability errors group, and deviation of both directional and variability errors group, had larger SPV variability errors than did the nondeviation group. Furthermore, the deviation of variability errors group showed a significant improvement in variability errors after 1 month. There was a correlation between the initial SPV with eyes opened variability error and total FIM after 1 month in Pusher patients with unilateral spatial neglect in the deviation of both directional and variability errors group.Conclusions: SPV with eyes opened variability errors and initial FIM score may influence the independence of activities of daily living after 1 month in the recovery of patients with stroke with Pusher and unilateral spatial neglect.

This study aimed to determine the effect of delayed visual feedback on the center of pressure and sitting balance in patients with stroke. [Participants and Methods] This was a single-blinded, randomized crossover trial. The duration of each intervention in real-time visual feedback and delayed visual feedback conditions while sitting on the platform was five days. We measured the center of pressure, function in sitting test, and functional independence measure for physiotherapy assessment. [Results] Twenty patients with stroke were included in this study. The delayed visual feedback condition improved the center of pressure for lateral distance, function in sitting test, and functional independence measure. The lateral center of pressure deviation increased significantly after 500 ms of intervention. The function in sitting test evaluated the interaction between pre-and post-training, and these conditions revealed that timing and condition factors contributed to the improvement. Sitting balance training affected the functional independence measure. [Conclusion] Sensory-motor and cognitive learning was facilitated through balance training with delayed visual feedback, and the internal model was updated with the efference copy of error correction. Sensory-motor feedback to visual stimulation can improve postural control, balance, and activities of daily living.

Background: In sensory-motor rehabilitation, sitting-balance training using a wedge may enable optimal postural control. The efficacy and mechanism of achieving lateral adaptation to the sitting pressure and postural vertical are unclear. Methods: We included 20 healthy participants in a single-blind, randomized crossover trial conducted over 1 day. Sitting pressure was measured while the postural vertical was assessed. The initial training required maximally and laterally inclining the trunk to the left or right, with or without a wedge, 60 times in 2 minutes (0.25 Hz). A repeated-measures 2-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc analysis was used, and a P value < .05 considered statistically significant. Results: After wedge-adaptation training, the pressure on the weight-bearing surface in the postural vertical position increased only on the left side (P < .05). The directional and variability errors of the subjective postural vertical with eyes open and subjective postural vertical were within the range of normative values on verticality. Conclusion: Wedge-adaptation during sitting training affected sitting pressure and verticality. Therefore, there is potential for future rehabilitation interventions using sitting training with a wedge in individuals with balance disorders.