Posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS) in plants resuits from the degradation of mRNAs and shows phenomenological similarities with quelling in fungi and RNAi in animals. Here, we report the isolation of sgs2 and sgs3 Arabidopsis mutants impaired in PTGS. We establish a mechanistic link between PTGS, quelling, and RNAi since the Arabidopsis SGS2 protein is similar to an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase like N. crassa QDE-1, controlling quelling, and C. elegans EGO-1, controlling RNAi. In contrast, SGS3 shows no significant similarity with any known or putative protein, thus defining a specific step of PTGS in plants. Both sgs2 and sgs3 mutants show enhanced susceptibility to virus, definitively proving that PTGS is an antiviral defense mechanism that can also target transgene RNA for degradation.

trans-acting siRNAs (ta-siRNAs) are endogenous RNAs that direct the cleavage of complementary mRNA targets . TAS gene transcripts are cleaved by miRNAs; the cleavage products are protected against degradation by SGS3, copied into dsRNA by RDR6, and diced into ta-siRNAs by DCL4 . We describe hypomorphic rdr6 and sgs3 Arabidopsis mutants, which do not exhibit the leaf developmental defects observed in null mutants and which, like null alleles, are impaired in sense-transgene-induced posttranscriptional gene silencing and virus resistance. Null rdr6 and sgs3 mutants lack TAS1, TAS2, and TAS3 ta-siRNAs and overaccumulate ARF3/ETTIN and ARF4 mRNAs, which are TAS3 ta-siRNA targets. A hypomorphic rdr6 mutant accumulates wild-type TAS3 ta-siRNA levels but not TAS1 and TAS2 ta-siRNAs, suggesting that TAS3 is required for proper leaf development. Consistently, tas3 but not tas1 or tas2 mutants exhibits leaf morphology defects, and ago7/zip and drb4 mutants, which exhibit leaf morphology defects, lack TAS3 but not TAS1 and TAS2 ta-siRNAs in leaves. These results indicate that the dsRNA binding protein DRB4 is required for proper ta-siRNA production, presumably by interacting with DCL4, an interaction analogous to that of HYL1 with DCL1 during miRNA production , and that TAS3 ta-siRNAs are required for proper leaf development through the action of AGO7/ZIPPY.

No abstract

Summary The bacterial UidA gene cloned between the 35S promoter with a double enhancer and the terminator sequences of the pea rbcS 9C gene was introduced into tobacco plants. All 11 transformants carrying the transgene at a single locus showed silencing at each generation, but the timing of silencing occurred at different rates in the different transformants. Two plants showed high levels of UidA mRNA accumulation and GUS activity in young seedlings and a rapid decline of these levels during the first month of growth irrespective of the allelic state of the T‐DNA. The other plants showed high levels of UidA mRNA accumulation and GUS activity in young seedlings and a slow decline of these levels during the first 4 months of growth in homozygous plants, whereas these levels decline only after 1 year of growth in hemizygous plants. Haploids showed the same kinetics of silencing as the homozygous plants from which they derived. Silencing correlated with a strong decrease of the steady‐state level of UidA mRNA, while the transcription of the transgene in the nucleus was not affected. Since haploids and hemizygous plants derived from transformants carrying a single copy of the T‐DNA show silencing, and since all the plants express the transgene at a very high level before the triggering of silencing, the results suggest that post‐transcriptional silencing occurs through a dose effect and not through DNA‐DNA interaction.

Post-transcriptional gene silencing (cosuppression) results in the degradation of RNA after transcription. A transgenic Arabidopsis line showing post-transcriptional silencing of a 35S-uidA transgene and uidA-specific methylation was mutagenized using ethyl methanesulfonate. Six independent plants were isolated in which uidA mRNA accumulation and beta-glucuronidase activity were increased up to 3500-fold, whereas the transcription rate of the 35S-uidA transgene was increased only up to threefold. These plants each carried a recessive monogenic mutation that is responsible for the release of silencing. These mutations defined two genetic loci, called sgs1 and sgs2 (for suppressor of gene silencing). Transgene methylation was distinctly modified in sgs1 and sgs2 mutants. However, methylation of centromeric repeats was not affected, indicating that sgs mutants differ from ddm (for decrease in DNA methylation) and som (for somniferous) mutants. Indeed, unlike ddm and som mutations, sgs mutations were not able to release transcriptional silencing of a 35S-hpt transgene. Conversely, both sgs1 and sgs2 mutations were able to release cosuppression of host Nia genes and 35S-Nia2 transgenes. These results therefore indicate that sgs mutations act in trans to impede specifically transgene-induced post-transcriptional gene silencing.