Objective:
To assess intermediate outcomes among patients older than 13 years old who underwent a Ross procedure at a single center and to describe the relationship of external reinforcement with the need for aortic reinterventions
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of a single center clinical records from 2005 to 2020. Comparative analysis of baseline and perioperative variables was done using non-parametric test between Ross procedure and modified Ross procedure. Kaplan Meier function was used to evaluate the survival free from aortic reintervention.
Results:
A total of 40 patients with a median age of 17.9 years (IQR 15.4 - 20.1), 88% (n= 35) males and median weight of 64.1 Kg (IQR 55.8-83.2) were included, where 15% (n= 6) had a Ross-Konno procedure and 85% (n= 34) a Ross procedure. Overall, 70% (n= 28) of the patients had the pulmonary autograft reinforced with a woven vascular graft, with a median size of 28 mm (IQR 26 - 28). The most common indication for surgery was a mixed stenotic/insufficiency lesion in 75% (n=10) of cases, and the most common anatomic configuration was a bicuspid valve in 73% (n= 29); 65% (n= 26) of the patients had had a pre-Ross aortic intervention. No differences were observed between the reinforced and non-reinforce group in terms of age (16 vs 18 years: p=0.29), and weight (63 vs. 69 kg; p=0.57) nor indication for surgery (Table 1). After a median follow up time of 5.1 years (IQR 2.6 - 7.8), 25% (n=3) of the non-reinforced Ross had required aortic reinterventions compared to 4% (n=1) with the reinforced group. The survival free from aortic reintervention at 5 years was 96% (CI 87 - 99) in the cohort, without differences in the Kaplan Meier curves between the 2 groups (log rank= 0.18)
Conclusion:
Intermediate outcomes after the Ross procedure in patients >13 years old are favorable, with a lower rate of reintervention in patients with a reinforced autograft. Long term outcomes are needed to further elucidate the greater impact of external support of valve competency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.