Background: There is insufficient data in the literature regarding the real-life, daily clinical practice evaluation of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (APD). We are not sure what is the upper limit of dopaminergic medication, especially the levodopa (LD) dosage, and how it is influenced by access and suitability to the various add-on and device-aided therapies (DAT). Objective: This retrospective study explored the profile of APD patients that were considered and systematically evaluated regarding the suitability for DAT. Methods: We analyzed the data from 311 consecutive patients with APD hospitalized between 2011 and 2017 that 1) described at least 2 hrs/day off periods divided into at least two instances/day (except early morning akinesia), 2) were in stage 3 or above on the Hoehn and Yahr scale, 3) were with or without dyskinesia, and 4) received at least four levodopa doses/day combined with adjuvant therapy. Results: Of the 311 patients enrolled initially, 286 patients showed up for the second visit, of which in 125 cases we assessed that DAT would be necessary. Finally, 107 patients were tested in our clinic to confirm the efficacy of LCIG. Patients selected for DAT had significantly longer off periods, more frequent dyskinesia, early morning akinesia, and freezing despite having significantly higher LD doses than those with an improved conservative therapy. Conclusion: Patients with APD can have a variety of symptoms, and because symptoms and therapeutical efficacy can be manifested in many different combinations, it is not possible to decide using a single, rigid set of criteria which APD patient is eligible for DAT. Nevertheless, treating physicians should refer APD patients to a specialized movement disorder center when patients with an average daily dose of LD of at least 750-1000 mg and maximal complementary therapies present daily motor complications that significantly reduce the quality of life.

Introduction: The motor and non-motor complications of Parkinson’s disease impair the patients’ quality of life and limit therapeutical options. There are no clear criteria for ‘advanced’ Parkinson’s disease or for the optimal moment for invasive therapies. There is little evidence regarding the upper limits of levodopa doses, and how these may be influenced by the availability of device-aided therapies. Aim: To analyze substitution therapy in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. Method: In our retrospective study, we analyzed the data from all patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease hospitalized between 1st June 2011 and 31st May 2017, receiving combined levodopa treatment at least 4×/day, reporting a minimum of 2 hours off periods, with or without dyskinesia. We analyzed levodopa therapy for patients who were recommended either device-aided or conservative therapy. Results: Out of 311 patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease, for 125 we proposed device-aided therapies whereas in 42 patients we increased the levodopa dose. The average levodopa doses and the administration rate were higher for the 107 patients tested for levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel. Disease duration, mean levodopa doses and frequency of dosing were all higher in patients proposed for device-aided therapies versus patients with continued conservative treatment. Conclusion: Our patients were on lower levodopa doses (compared to literature), but the combinations were used more often. Device-aided therapies should be considered in patients with severe motor complications who receive at least 750–1000 mg levodopa daily, divided minimum 5×/day. These patients need to be tested in specialized centers by multidisciplinary teams in order to make the best decision for further action. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(17): 662–669.

No abstract

One of the most challenging problems during the design of bilateral teleoperation systems implemented over Wide Area Networks is to assure the stability and transparency in the presence of time varying communication delay between the master and the slave. In this work the influence of the delay and jitter on the passivity controller -passivity observer type stabilizers is analyzed. This control design approach does not require the explicit knowledge on the communication delay. In spite of this fact in this work it is shown that time varying the delay influences the teleoperation performances. Firstly, the relation between the delay and the dissipated energy by the controller was studied. Secondly, it was shown that in the presence of jitter the passivity controller can induce undesired oscillations into the received signals, affecting the transparency of the teleoperation. To handle this problem an extended passivity controller was proposed which assures better performances in the presence of jitter. Experimental measurements, including teleoperation experiments between two universities situated in different countries, are performed to validate the theoretical results.

No abstract