Background: Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that bridges factor IXa and factor X to restore hemostasis in patients with hemophilia A (HA). Its efficacy and safety have been proven in multicenter trials. However, real world data regarding its use in very young children are currently lacking. Ancillary test results for monitoring emicizumab's hemostatic effect and their clinical correlations are scarce. Methods:Children with HA and inhibitors treated by emicizumab were prospectively followed at our center. Laboratory follow-up included rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thrombin generation (TG), prior to and during treatment.Results: Eleven children whose median age was 26 months were treated by emicizumab and followed for a median of 36 weeks. During follow-up, none experienced hemarthrosis or any other spontaneous bleeds. For 7/11 patients, emicizumab prophylaxis was sufficient to maintain hemostasis without additional supplemental therapy. Only 4/11 patients were occasionally treated with recombinant activated FVII for trauma. Two minor surgeries were safely performed without supplemental therapy while another procedure was complicated by major bleeding. TG parameters improved for all patients, correlating with their clinical status. Interestingly, the lowest TG values were obtained for patients experiencing bleeding episodes, while ROTEM parameters in all patients were close to the normal range. Conclusions:This study confirms the safety and efficacy of emicizumab in reducing bleeds in young children with HA with inhibitors, including infants. However, surgeries warrant caution as emicizumab prophylaxis may not be sufficient for some procedures. TG may more accurately reflect the hemostasis state than ROTEM in pediatric patients treated with emicizumab. K E Y W O R D Semicizumab, hemophilia A, inhibitors, ROTEM, thrombin generation

Real-world data on emicizumab use and monitoring in paediatric severe haemophilia A (HA) patients are scarce. We therefore sought to evaluate safety, efficacy, and laboratory monitoring of emicizumab prophylaxis in a cohort of 40 children with severe HA, including 22 non-inhibitor patients and nine infants younger than one year. Bleeding, trauma, adverse events, and surgeries were documented during a median follow-up of 45 weeks. Emicizumab levels, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values, and thrombin generation were measured before and during therapy. Twenty patients experienced zero bleeds. All bleeding was trauma-related, and bleeding risk was positively correlated with the length of emicizumab prophylaxis. Sixteen surgical interventions were performed in 12 patients, with no thrombotic complications or thrombotic microangiopathy. Prolonged aPTT values normalised after emicizumab initiation, correlating with an increase in emicizumab plasma levels. Elevation in the thrombin generation was observed following emicizumab prophylaxis, with lower values recorded in younger infants. Emicizumab prophylaxis was safe and well tolerated. As all bleedings were trauma-related, laboratory monitoring could not predict bleeding risk. Our results do not support routine thrombin generation monitoring in children treated by emicizumab, yet further studies are warranted in the context of surgical procedures.

Introduction Real‐world data on prophylaxis of severe haemophilia A (HA) patients treated by emicizumab are scarce. Aim To study the efficacy and safety of longitudinal emicizumab prophylaxis and assess laboratory monitoring correlations in a large patient cohort. Methods HA patients with and without FVIII inhibitors, initiating emicizumab prophylaxis, were prospectively enrolled. Bleeding, adverse events and surgeries were documented. FVIII inhibitors, emicizumab levels and thrombin generation (TG) were sequentially measured. Results A total of 107 patients, including 58 children (whose median (IQR) age was 6 (1–11) years) with severe HA, composed the study cohort. Twenty‐nine per cent (31/107) of our HA patients had FVIII inhibitors. Patients were followed for a median of 67 weeks (up to 144 weeks). Fifty‐three patients, whose median follow‐up was 53 weeks, experienced zero bleeds. Most bleeds (94%) among children were trauma‐related, whereas 61% of adults sustained spontaneous joint bleeds. Four patients experienced major bleeds, with a fatal outcome in one infant, who also presented with central venous line thrombosis. No other serious adverse events were encountered. Seven patients have decided to stop emicizumab treatment for various reasons. Emicizumab plasma levels increased after emicizumab prophylaxis initiation, and values were maintained during follow‐up, in all but one patient, suspected of anti‐drug antibodies. A significant reduction of FVIII inhibitor levels was noted among inhibitor patients. TG was increased and sustained yet could not prognosticate bleeding risk. Conclusion Emicizumab prophylaxis was mostly well tolerated, although 50% of patients experienced breakthrough bleeds. Routine TG monitoring is not obligatory, and further studies are warranted in selected patient populations.