The objective of this study was to analyze morphologically the all-etching bonding system and self-etching bonding system for enamel with different degrees of fluorosis and evaluate the bond strength of each system. Teeth that were indicated for extraction owing to orthodontic or periodontal problems were selected. According to Dean's index and the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index, 180 extracted teeth were divided into three groups of mild, moderate, and severe dental fluorosis (DF), with 60 teeth in each group. The teeth in each group were randomly divided into two subgroups (n = 30), which were then subjected to the all-etching bonding system (Prime & Bond NT) and selfetching bonding system (SE-Bond). Each group of adhesives was used to bond Z350 universal resin (3 M) to the etched dental enamel. Tensile and shear tests were conducted to determine the bond strength. Subsequently, the fractured specimens were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The Prime & Bond NT was statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of enamel with mild fluorosis (P < 0.05) but did not exhibit a significant difference for moderate and severe DF (P > 0.05). The SE-Bond was not statistically significant for the tensile and shear strength of mild, moderate, or severe DF (P > 0.05). The SEM and CLSM results reveal that the mild fluorosis enamel crystals were relatively dense, and a small amount of resin remained. The moderate fluorosis enamel crystals were loosely arranged, and the gaps were widened. The severe fluorosis enamel crystals were irregularly arranged. The disorder was aggravated, and the dentinal orifice was exposed by partial enamel exfoliation. The bonding strength of mild fluorosis enamel with the Prime & Bond NT was better than that with the SE-Bond, and cohesive failure was the most common mode of failure. Because there was no difference in the bonding strength of the SE-Bond for different degrees of DF, we recommend the use of the all-etching adhesive system in the clinical treatment of teeth with mild fluorosis.
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of two adhesives on the bond strength of different degrees of dental fluorosis (DF). Methods: Teeth which were indicated for extractions for orthodontic or periodontal problems were selected. 180 extracted teeth were selected with varying degrees of DF based on modified Dean's fluorosis index, including 60 teeth with mild fluorosis, 60 teeth with moderate fluorosis, and 60 teeth with severe fluorosis. The teeth in each group were randomly divided into 2 subgroups (n=30) that were subjected to the all-etching bonding system (Prime & Bond NT) and self-etching bonding system (SE-Bond). Each group of adhesives was used to bond Z350 universal resin (3M) to the etched dental enamel. Tensile and shear testing were used to determine the bond strength. After the tensile testing, the fractured specimens were examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and laser scanning confocal microscope. (LSCM). Results: The Prime & Bond NT had statistically significant on tensile and shear strength for mild fluorosis enamel (P<0.05), but it had no significant difference for moderate and severe dental fluorosis (P>0.05). Self-etching bonding system (SE-Bond) had no statistical significance on the tensile and shear strength for mild, moderate and severe dental fluorosis (P>0.05). SEM and LSCM showed that the mild fluorosis enamel crystals were relatively dense and a small amount of resin remained. The moderate fluorosis enamel crystals were loosely arranged and the gaps were widened. The severe fluorosis enamel crystals were irregularly arranged. The disorder was aggravated, and the dentinal orifice exposed by partial enamel exfoliation can be seen. Conclusions: The bonding strength of mild fluorosis enamel to Prime & Bond NT was better than that of SE-Bond . And there is no difference in the bonding strength of SE-Bond to different degrees of DF.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.