No abstract

The most accurate wave energy converter models for heaving point absorbers include nonlinearities, which increase as resonance is achieved to maximize the energy capture. Over the power production spectrum and within the physical limits of the devices, the efficiency of wave energy converters can be enhanced by employing a control scheme that accounts for these nonlinearities. This paper proposes a sliding mode control for a heaving point absorber that includes the nonlinear effects of the dynamic and static Froude-Krylov forces. The sliding mode controller tracks a reference velocity that matches the phase of the excitation force to ensure higher energy absorption. This control algorithm is tested in regular linear waves and is compared to a complex-conjugate control and a nonlinear variation of the complex-conjugate control. The results show that the sliding mode control successfully tracks the reference and keeps the device displacement bounded while absorbing more energy than the other control strategies. Furthermore, due to the robustness of the control law, it can also accommodate disturbances and uncertainties in the dynamic model of the wave energy converter.

Point absorber wave energy converter (WEC) control strategies often require accurate models for maximum energy extraction. While linear models are suitable for small motions, the focus is on the nonlinear model of an hour-glass shaped buoy undergoing large vertical displacements. Closed-form expressions for the static and dynamic Froude–Krylov forces are developed. It is shown that, in general, the dynamic and static forces are of similar magnitude, which is not the case for a spherical buoy. While the dynamic force reduces the amplitude of the net buoy force, its shape predicts a larger buoy response than if neglected, causing the nonlinear terms to have an even more significant effect. An input-state feedback linearizing controller is developed to show how the nonlinear model can be used in a control law. A 2.5 m buoy example is simulated to illustrate the approach of tracking an arbitrary displacement reference. For the case considered, the extracted power is 30% larger when the nonlinear dynamic FK force is used in the control law. The hourglass buoy is also compared to a spherical buoy to illustrate differences in their response to regular waves and energy extraction when using the same control laws. A spherical buoy diameter of 7.5 m was required to obtain the same power output as a 5 m tall hourglass buoy. A power-force-amplitude (PFA) metric is introduced to compare energy extraction performance and power take-off requirements. The hourglass buoy’s PFA was 13% larger than the spherical buoy implying that it can produce similar power but with less control effort.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY