This study was undertaken to determine if healing rates are reliable early predictors of ultimate complete wound closure in venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot wounds. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 306 venous leg ulcers and 241 diabetic foot ulcers enrolled in two large controlled, prospective, randomized pivotal trials to compare topical wound treatments, to determine whether certain early markers of healing could be correlated with later total wound closure. Two-sided tests at 95% confidence demonstrated that wound margin advance, initial healing rate, percent wound surface area reduction, and wound healing trajectories (all p<0.001) were powerful predictors of complete wound healing at 12 weeks. Wounds with poor healing progress by these criteria at 4 weeks were highly likely to remain unhealed after 8 additional weeks of treatment. Analysis of the diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers subgroups separately demonstrated consistent statistical test results with high significance; similarly, the results remained valid independent of the topical treatment used. The early prediction of eventual wound healing or nonhealing using early healing rates may enable more efficient triage of patients to advanced healing technologies. We believe that these surrogate markers are robust predictors of healing regardless of wound etiology and that they merit wider use in clinical trials and routine patient care.
About 600,000 people in the United States are estimated to be affected by venous ulcers. The cornerstone of care of chronic venous ulcers involves the application of compression bandages. Other therapies include treatment of associated infection, treatment for edema and inflammation, and debridement when necessary. Repifermin, a recombinant human KGF-2 (fibroblast growth factor-10), exerts a proliferative effect on epithelial cells, in vitro and in vivo, and has been shown to accelerate wound healing in several experimental animal models. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical repifermin treatment, for 12 weeks, in the healing of chronic venous ulcers in 94 patients. Repifermin was shown to accelerate wound healing, with significantly more patients achieving 75% wound closure with repifermin than with placebo. The treatment effect appeared more marked for a subgroup of patients with initial wound areas < or = 15 cm2 and wound ages of < or = 18 months. A longer duration of treatment (e.g., 26 weeks) may allow better differentiation of the benefit of repifermin compared with placebo, particularly with respect to complete wound closure. The safety assessment showed that repifermin was well tolerated.
Covering wounds, acute and chronic, is one of the most fundamental activities of any medical practitioner. Although wound dressings primarily serve to contain the "good" and keep out the "bad," research has characterized more specifically the sophisticated interaction between the human wound bed and its dressing counterpart. Wound dressings for today's chronic wounds come in many flavors, ranging from the classic types of moisture-retentive dressings to silver-coated varieties to biologic dressings serving as skin substitutes. Moisture-retentive dressing types include foams, films, hydrogels, hydrocolloids, and alginates. Appropriate use of these dressings can help to keep the wound bed moist, which allows for epithelial migration, angiogenesis, retention of growth factors, autolytic debridement, and maintenance of electrical gradients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.