No abstract

IntroductionIn Brazil, the use of antiretrovirals is widespread: more than 260,000 individuals are currently undergoing treatment. We conducted a survey targeting antiretroviral-naïve individuals who were initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) according to local guidelines. This survey covered five Brazilian regions.MethodsThe HIV Threshold Survey methodology (HIV-THS) of the World Health Organization was utilized, and subjects were selected from seven highly populated cities representative of all Brazilian macro-regions. Dried blood spots (DBS) were collected on SS903 collection cards and were transported by regular mail at room temperature to a single central laboratory for genotyping.ResultsWe analysed samples from 329 individuals initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), 39 (11.8%) of whom were harbouring transmitted drug resistance (TDR). The mean CD4+ T cell count was 253 cells/µL, and the mean viral load was 142,044 copies/mL. The regional prevalence of resistance was 17.0% in the Northeast, 12.8% in the Southeast, 10.6% in the Central region, 8.5% in the North and 8.5% in the South. The inhibitor-specific TDR prevalence was 6.9% for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 4.9% for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and 3.9% for protease inhibitors; 3.6% of individuals presented resistance to more than one class of inhibitors. Overall, there were trends towards higher prevalences of subtype C towards the South and subtype F towards the North. Of the DBS samples collected, 9.3% failed to provide reliable results.DiscussionWe identified variable TDR prevalence, ranging from intermediate to high levels, among individuals in whom HIV disease progressed, thus implying that resistance testing before initiating ART could be effective in Brazil. Our results also indicate that the use of DBS might be especially valuable for providing access to testing in resource-limited and remote settings.

Trial DesignOpen-label, randomised, controlled, pilot proof-of-concept clinical trial.MethodsParticipants: Antiretroviral naïve adult males with CD4 count ≥ 350 cells/mm3.Interventions: Patients were randomised to receive thalidomide 200 mg QD for 3 weeks (Thalidomide group) or not (Control group) and followed for 48 weeks.Objective: We hypothesized that short-term Thalidomide use would reduce HIV related inflammation and HIV replication among antiretroviral naïve HIV infected individuals.Outcome: Viral loads, CD4/CD8 counts, ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein (US-CRP), cell activation markers, and plasma lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were analyzed.Randomisation: Unrestricted randomisation.Blinding: No blinding was used.ResultsNumbers randomised: Thirty recruited individuals were randomised to Thalidomide (16 patients) or Control (14 patients) groups.Recruitment: Patients were recruited from April 2011 to January 2013.Outcome: Viral loads remained stable in both groups. During thalidomide treatment, a decrease in CD4/CD8 ratio (p = 0.04), a decrease in CD4 count (p = 0.04), an increase in cell activation calculated by the percentage of CD38 +/HLA-DR+ CD8 cells (p < 0.05) and an increase in US-CRP (p < 0.01) were observed in the Thalidomide group, with all parameters returning to baseline levels after thalidomide interruption. We confirmed that thalidomide increased HIV replication in vitro of 6 of 7 samples from long-term antiretroviral suppressed individuals.Harms: No class 3/4 adverse events occurred.ConclusionsShort-term use of thalidomide led to an intense transient increase in T cell activation and inflammation, with a decrease in the CD4+ cell count without changes to the CD8+ cell count. We confirmed that thalidomide acts in vitro as a latency reversal agent and speculate that the in vivo results obtained were due to an increase in HIV replication.

The concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir in seminal and blood plasma and the seminal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load were quantified by HPLC and the Nuclisens assay, respectively, in a cross-sectional study of 16 HIV-1-infected Brazilian men under stable treatment with a lopinavir/ritonavir containing antiretroviral regimen. Semen and blood samples were collected on 2 occasions: at 6 to 60 minutes before ("trough"), and 5 to 6 hours after ("peak") ingestion of regular doses of lopinavir/ritonavir. Median seminal lopinavir levels were 120.6 ng/mL (range, <20-1481.8 ng/mL) and 233.1 ng/mL (range, 48.4-1133.4 ng/mL) at trough and peak points, respectively. The corresponding values for ritonavir were 9.2 ng/mL (range, <5-47 ng/mL) and 17.1 ng/mL (range, 6.6-66.7 ng/mL). The median concentrations of lopinavir and ritonavir in semen were, respectively, 1.9% to 3% and 3.7% to 4.4% of those measured in blood plasma samples collected within 30 minutes. HIV-1 viral load was detectable in the semen of 2 and in the blood of 6 of 16 patients. These results may have implications for drug-resistant HIV-1 evolution and transmission.