Our findings suggest that the preoperative administration of phenazopyridine may improve postoperative voiding function after a retropubic midurethral sling. Additional prospective trials are needed to confirm this finding.
Objectives
The objective of our study was to determine if phenazopyridine reduces void trial (VT) failure rates after prolapse surgery.
Methods
A single-institution randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing a second dose of phenazopyridine 200 mg on postoperative day 1 versus no additional phenazopyridine in women undergoing prolapse surgery. All subjects (including controls) received 200 mg of phenazopyridine preoperatively for ureteral patency verification. The intervention group received a second dose of phenazopyridine 200 mg the morning of postoperative day 1. The primary outcome was assessed using a standardized VT. Secondary outcomes included pain, opioid usage, urinary tract infections, and prolonged or recurrent urinary retention. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed with a χ2 test to compare failure rates between the intervention and control groups.
Results
We enrolled 152 women, and 76 were randomized to each group. There was no difference in VT failures between the 2 groups—34% failed without phenazopyridine on postoperative day 1, and 42% failed with phenazopyridine on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.326). Subject characteristics were similar across both groups. Pain scores immediately before the VT were 3 out of 10 in both groups (P = 0.206), with no difference in opioid consumption (P = 0.750). There were no differences in the rate of urinary tract infections or prolonged or recurrent urinary retention between the groups (P = 0.304 and P = 0.745).
Conclusions
While previous studies suggested an improvement in immediate postoperative voiding with phenazopyridine, our randomized controlled trial does not support this.
Objectives
To evaluate the effect of bilateral pudendal nerve blockade on immediate postoperative bladder emptying after midurethral sling.
Methods
We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of women undergoing a midurethral sling procedure between October 2017 and February of 2019. Women older than 18 years were eligible if they were undergoing a midurethral sling with no concomitant procedures and had no preoperative urinary retention. Participant demographics and medical conditions that may affect bladder emptying were recorded preoperatively. Participants were randomized to a bilateral pudendal injection of either bupivacaine or normal saline. After induction of anesthesia, the pudendal injection was administered before any incisions. No other local anesthesia was used. The primary outcome was the rate of passing a standardized void trial. Secondary outcomes included perioperative pain scores, analgesia use, and complications.
Results
Ninety-one participants were enrolled in the study. One patient had a delayed void trial on postoperative day 1, leaving 90 participants for the final analysis. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were similar between the groups. Adjusted logistic regression showed that the administration of a bupivacaine pudendal block led to a higher rate of void trial failure (43% vs 20%, odds ratio = 0.32, P = 0.02 adjusted for age, body mass index, and comorbidities). Postoperative pain scores and analgesia use were similar between the groups. Postoperative complications, including urinary tract infection, mesh erosion, pelvic hematoma, or urinary retention within 6 weeks were similar between the groups.
Conclusions
Our prospective trial demonstrates that a bilateral pudendal blockade before midurethral sling procedure worsens postoperative bladder emptying.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.