The primary purpose of the present study is to determine if an organized control scheme exists for the antagonist muscle during steady isometric torque. A secondary focus is to better understand how firing rates of the antagonist muscle changes from a moderate- to higher-contraction intensity. Fourteen subjects performed two submaximal isometric trapezoid muscle actions of the forearm flexors that included a linearly increasing, steady force at both 40% and 70% maximum voluntary contraction, and linearly decreasing segments. Surface electromyographic signals of the biceps and triceps brachii were collected and decomposed into constituent motor unit action potential trains. Motor unit firing rate vs. recruitment threshold, motor unit action potential amplitude vs. recruitment threshold, and motor unit firing rate vs. action potential amplitude relationships of the biceps brachii (agonist) and triceps brachii (antagonist) muscles were analyzed. Moderate- to-strong relationships (|r| ³ 0.69) were present for the agonist and antagonist muscles for each relationship with no differences between muscles (p = 0.716, 0.428, 0.182). The y-intercepts of the motor unit firing rate vs. recruitment threshold relationship of the antagonist did not increase from 40% to 70% maximal voluntary contractions (p = 0.96), unlike for the agonist (p = 0.009). The antagonist muscle exhibits a similar motor unit control scheme to the agonist. Unlike the agonist, however, the firing rates of the antagonist did not increase with increasing intensity. Future research should investigate how antagonist firing rates adapt to resistance training and changes in antagonist firing rates in the absence of peripheral feedback.

The effects of low load resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) on hypertrophy of type I/II myofibers remains unclear, especially in females. The purpose of the present study is to examine changes in type I/II myofiber cross-sectional area (fCSA) and muscle CSA (mCSA) of the vastus lateralis (VL) pre- to post-6 weeks of high load resistance training (HL, n=15, 8 females) and low load resistance training with BFR (n=16, 8 females). Mixed-effects models were used to analyze fCSA with group (HL, BFR), sex (M, F), fiber type (I, II), and time (Pre-, Post-) included as factors. mCSA increased pre- to post-training (p<0.001, d=0.91) and was greater in males compared to females (p<0.001, d=2.26). Type II fCSA increased pre- to post-HL (p<0.05, d=0.46) and was greater in males compared to females (p<0.05, d=0.78). There were no significant increases in fCSA pre- to post-BFR for either fiber type or sex. Cohen's d, however, revealed moderate effect sizes in type I and II fCSA for males ( d=0.59 & 0.67), although this did not hold true for females ( d=0.29 & 0.34). Conversely, the increase in type II fCSA was greater for females than males following HL. In conclusion, low load resistance training with BFR may not promote myofiber hypertrophy to the level of HL resistance training, and similar responses were generally observed for males and females. In contrast, comparable effect sizes for mCSA and 1RM between groups suggest that BFR could play a role in a resistance training program.

The primary purpose of the present study was to examine motor unit (MU) firing rates in agonist and antagonist muscles during periods of steady, maximal efforts using explosive and slower rates of torque development. A secondary purpose was to analyse the MU firing rate versus action potential amplitude relationships of the agonist and antagonist muscles during maximal efforts. Thirteen subjects (mean ± SD; age, 21.2 ± 3.6 years; mass 81.1 ± 21.3 kg; and stature, 177.1±9.9 cm) performed two maximal isometric trapezoid muscle actions of the elbow flexors that included either an explosive or a slower, linearly increasing rate (ramp) of torque development. Surface EMG signals of the biceps brachii (BB) and triceps brachii (TB) muscles were collected and decomposed into their constituent MU action potential trains. The MU firing rate versus action potential amplitude relationships of the BB (agonist) and TB (antagonist) muscles were analysed. Moderate to strong relationships (|r| ≥ 0.65) were present for the explosive and ramp contractions in the agonist and antagonist muscles.Firing rates of smaller and larger MUs were higher during the explosive [mean ± SD; agonist = 18.1 ± 6.9 pulses per second (pps), antagonist = 22.0±3.9 pps] than the ramp (agonist = 14.0 ± 5.1 pps, antagonist = 18.3 ± 4.4 pps) contractions for the agonist (P = 0.013) and antagonist muscles (P = 0.007). The antagonist muscle exhibits a similar MU firing rate versus action potential amplitude relationship to the agonist muscle at maximal efforts. Future research should investigate the effects of shortterm resistance training on antagonist firing rates and the involvement of peripheral feedback on firing rates during maximal efforts performed at various rates of torque development.

No abstract