Association Rule Mining is the significant way to extract knowledge from data sets. The association among the instance of a dataset can measured with Interestingness Measures (IM) metrics. IM define how much interesting the extract knowledge is. Researchers have proved that the classical Support-Confidence metrics can't extract the real knowledge and they have been proposing different IM. From a user perspective it's really tough to select the minimal and best measures from them. From our experiment, the correlation among the various IM such as Support, Confidence, Lift, Cosine, Jaccard, Leverage etc. are evaluated in different popular data sets. In this paper our contribution is to find the correlation among the IM with different ranges in different types of data sets which were not applied in past researches. This study also identified that the correlation varies from data set to data set and proposed a solution based on multiple criterion that will help the users to select the minimal and best from a large number of IM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.