No abstract

Background Cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) is the ratio of the diameter of the heart to the diameter of the thorax. An abnormal CTR (>0.55) is often an indicator of an underlying pathological condition. The accurate prediction of an abnormal CTR chest X-rays (CXRs) aids in the early diagnosis of clinical conditions. Purpose We propose a deep learning (DL)-based model for automatic CTR calculation to assist radiologists with rapid diagnosis of cardiomegaly and thus optimise the radiology flow. Material and Methods The study population included 1012 posteroanterior CXRs from a single institution. The Attention U-Net DL architecture was used for the automatic calculation of CTR. An observer performance test was conducted to assess the radiologist’s performance in diagnosing cardiomegaly with and without artificial intelligence assistance. Results U-Net model exhibited a sensitivity of 0.80 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.85], specificity >99%, precision of 0.99 [95% CI: 0.98, 1], and a F1 score of 0.88 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.91]. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the reviewing radiologist in identifying cardiomegaly increased from 40.50% to 88.4% when aided by the AI-generated CTR. Conclusion Our segmentation-based AI model demonstrated high specificity (>99%) and sensitivity (80%) for CTR calculation. The performance of the radiologist on the observer performance test improved significantly with provision of AI assistance. A DL-based segmentation model for rapid quantification of CTR can therefore have significant potential to be used in clinical workflows by reducing radiologists’ burden and alerting to an abnormal enlarged heart early on.

No abstract

We propose an automated method based on deep learning to compute the cardiothoracic ratio and detect the presence of cardiomegaly from chest radiographs. We develop two separate models to demarcate the heart and chest regions in an X-ray image using bounding boxes and use their outputs to calculate the cardiothoracic ratio. We obtain a sensitivity of 0.96 at a specificity of 0.81 with a mean absolute error of 0.0209 on a held-out test dataset and a sensitivity of 0.84 at a specificity of 0.97 with a mean absolute error of 0.018 on an independent dataset from a different hospital. We also compare three different segmentation model architectures for the proposed method and observe that Attention U-Net yields better results than SE-Resnext U-Net and EfficientNet U-Net. By providing a numeric measurement of the cardiothoracic ratio, we hope to mitigate human subjectivity arising out of visual assessment in the detection of cardiomegaly. Related WorkComputer aided-diagnosis has been used to detect cardiomegaly in a chest X-ray with or without using deep learn-

Purpose: Manual interpretation of chest radiographs is a challenging task and is prone to errors. An automated system capable of categorizing chest radiographs based on the pathologies identified could aid in the timely and efficient diagnosis of chest pathologies. Method: For this retrospective study, 4476 chest radiographs were collected between January and April 2021 from two tertiary care hospitals. Three expert radiologists established the ground truth, and all radiographs were analyzed using a deep-learning AI model to detect suspicious ROIs in the lungs, pleura, and cardiac regions. Three test readers (different from the radiologists who established the ground truth) independently reviewed all radiographs in two sessions (unaided and AI-aided mode) with a washout period of one month. Results: The model demonstrated an aggregate AUROC of 91.2% and a sensitivity of 88.4% in detecting suspicious ROIs in the lungs, pleura, and cardiac regions. These results outperform unaided human readers, who achieved an aggregate AUROC of 84.2% and sensitivity of 74.5% for the same task. When using AI, the aided readers obtained an aggregate AUROC of 87.9% and a sensitivity of 85.1%. The average time taken by the test readers to read a chest radiograph decreased by 21% (p < 0.01) when using AI. Conclusion: The model outperformed all three human readers and demonstrated high AUROC and sensitivity across two independent datasets. When compared to unaided interpretations, AI-aided interpretations were associated with significant improvements in reader performance and chest radiograph interpretation time.