Background Treatment of wheat with the phytohormones abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA) has been shown to affect Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease severity. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the elicited phenotypes remain unclear. Toward addressing this gap in our knowledge, global transcriptomic profiling was applied to the FHB-susceptible wheat cultivar ‘Fielder’ to map the regulatory responses effected upon treatment with ABA, an ABA receptor antagonist (AS6), or GA in the presence or absence of Fusarium graminearum (Fg) challenge. Results Spike treatments resulted in a total of 30,876 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified in ‘Fielder’ (26,004) and the Fg (4872) pathogen. Topology overlap and correlation analyses defined 9689 wheat DEGs as Fg-related across the treatments. Further enrichment analyses demonstrated that these included expression changes within ‘Fielder’ defense responses, cell structural metabolism, molecular transport, and membrane/lipid metabolism. Dysregulation of ABA and GA crosstalk arising from repression of ‘Fielder’ FUS3 was noted. As well, expression of a putative Fg ABA-biosynthetic cytochrome P450 was detected. The co-applied condition of Fg + ABA elicited further up-regulation of phytohormone biosynthesis, as well as SA and ET signaling pathways and cell wall/polyphenolic metabolism. In contrast, co-applied Fg + GA mainly suppressed phytohormone biosynthesis and signaling, while modulating primary and secondary metabolism and flowering. Unexpectedly, co-applied Fg + AS6 did not affect ABA biosynthesis or signaling, but rather elicited antagonistic responses tied to stress, phytohormone transport, and FHB disease-related genes. Conclusions Observed exacerbation (misregulation) of classical defense mechanisms and cell wall fortifications upon ABA treatment are consistent with its ability to promote FHB severity and its proposed role as a fungal effector. In contrast, GA was found to modulate primary and secondary metabolism, suggesting a general metabolic shift underlying its reduction in FHB severity. While AS6 did not antagonize traditional ABA pathways, its impact on host defense and Fg responses imply potential for future investigation. Overall, by comparing these findings to those previously reported for four additional plant genotypes, an additive model of the wheat-Fg interaction is proposed in the context of phytohormone responses.

Fusarium head blight of wheat, caused by the filamentous fungus Fusarium graminearum , leads to devastating global food shortages and economic losses. Fungal hyphal chemotropism has been shown to be a major contributor to host-pathogen interactions. Here, the role of the opposite mating type GPCR, Ste3, is characterized with respect to F. graminearum chemotropism and pathogenicity. These findings contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying fungal chemotropism and pathogenesis.

BackgroundApplication of the wheat phytohormones abscisic acid (ABA) or gibberellic acid (GA) affect Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease severity; however, the molecular underpinnings of the elicited phenotypes remain unclear. Herein, the transcriptomic responses of an FHB-susceptible wheat cultivar ‘Fielder’ were characterized upon treatment with ABA, an ABA receptor antagonist (AS6), or GA in the presence or absence of Fusarium graminearum (Fg) challenge.ResultsA total of 30,876 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) where identified in ‘Fielder’ (26,004) and Fg (4,872). Fg challenge alone resulted in the most substantial wheat DEGs contributing to 57.2% of the total transcriptomic variation. Using a combination of topology overlap and correlation analyses, 9,689 Fg-related wheat DEGs were defined. Further enrichment analysis of the top 1% networked wheat DEGs identified critical expression changes within defense responses, cell structural metabolism, molecular transport, and membrane/lipid metabolism. Fg-challenged conditions also included the expression of a putative Fg ABA-biosynthetic cytochrome P450 and repression of wheat FUS3 for dysregulating ABA and GA crosstalk. ABA treatment alone elicited 4536 (32%) wheat DEGs common to those of the Fg-challenge, and Fg+ABA further enhanced 888 (12.5%) of them. These ABA elicited DEGs are involved in defense through both classical and non-classical phytohormone signaling and regulating cell wall structures including polyphenolic metabolism. Conversely, Fg+GA opposed 2239 (33%) Fg-elicited wheat DEGs, including modulating primary and secondary metabolism, defense responses, and flowering genes. ABA and jointly ABA⍰Fg⍰[Fg+ABA] treatments repressed, while Fg+GA induced an over-representation of wheat DEGs mapping to chromosome 6BL. Finally, compared to Fg+ABA, co-application of Fg+AS6 did not antagonize ABA biosynthesis or signal but rather elicited antagonistic Fg (557) and wheat (11) DEGs responses directly tied to stress responses, phytohormone transport, and FHB.ConclusionsComparative transcriptomics highlight the effects of wheat phytohormones on individual pathway and global metabolism simultaneously. Application of ABA may reduce FHB severity through misregulating defense mechanisms and cell wall fortification pathways. GA application may alter primary and secondary metabolism, creating a metabolic shift to ultimately reduce FHB severity. By comparing these findings to those previously reported for four additional plant genotypes, an additive model of the wheat-Fg interaction is proposed.

No abstract