BackgroundThis study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-based prediction models for lung metastasis (LM) in patients with Ewing sarcoma (ES), and to deploy the best model as an open access web tool.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database from 2010 to 2016 and from four medical institutions to develop and validate predictive models for LM in patients with ES. Patient data from the SEER database was used as the training group (n = 929). Using demographic and clinicopathologic variables six ML-based models for predicting LM were developed, and internally validated using 10-fold cross validation. All ML-based models were subsequently externally validated using multiple data from four medical institutions (the validation group, n = 51). The predictive power of the models was evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best-performing model was used to produce an online tool for use by clinicians to identify ES patients at risk from lung metastasis, to improve decision making and optimize individual treatment.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 929 patients from the SEER database and 51 patients from multiple medical centers, a total of 980 ES patients. Of these, 175 (18.8%) had lung metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with survival time, T-stage, N-stage, surgery, and bone metastasis providing the independent predictive factors of LM. The AUC value of six predictive models ranged from 0.585 to 0.705. The Random Forest (RF) model (AUC = 0.705) using 4 variables was identified as the best predictive model of LM in ES patients and was employed to construct an online tool to assist clinicians in optimizing patient treatment. (https://share.streamlit.io/liuwencai123/es_lm/main/es_lm.py).ConclusionsMachine learning were found to have utility for predicting LM in patients with Ewing sarcoma, and the RF model gave the best performance. The accessibility of the predictive model as a web-based tool offers clear opportunities for improving the personalized treatment of patients with ES.

Simple summaryStudies have shown that about 30% of kidney cancer patients will have metastasis, and lymph node metastasis (LNM) may be related to a poor prognosis. Our retrospective study aims to provide a reliable machine learning-based model to predict the occurrence of LNM in kidney cancer. We screened the pathological grade, liver metastasis, M staging, primary site, T staging, and tumor size from the training group (n=39016) formed by the SEER database and the validation group (n=771) formed by the medical center. Independent predictors of LNM in cancer patients. Using six different algorithms to build a prediction model, it is found that the prediction performance of the XGB model in the training group and the validation group is significantly better than any other machine learning model. The results show that prediction tools based on machine learning can accurately predict the probability of LNM in patients with kidney cancer and have satisfactory clinical application prospects.BackgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) is associated with the prognosis of patients with kidney cancer. This study aimed to provide reliable machine learning-based (ML-based) models to predict the probability of LNM in kidney cancer.MethodsData on patients diagnosed with kidney cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and Outcomes (SEER) database from 2010 to 2017, and variables were filtered by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Statistically significant risk factors were used to build predictive models. We used 10-fold cross-validation in the validation of the model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the performance of the model. Correlation heat maps were used to investigate the correlation of features using permutation analysis to assess the importance of predictors. Probability density functions (PDFs) and clinical utility curves (CUCs) were used to determine clinical utility thresholds.ResultsThe training cohort of this study included 39,016 patients, and the validation cohort included 771 patients. In the two cohorts, 2544 (6.5%) and 66 (8.1%) patients had LNM, respectively. Pathological grade, liver metastasis, M stage, primary site, T stage, and tumor size were independent predictive factors of LNM. In both model validation, the XGB model significantly outperformed any of the machine learning models with an AUC value of 0.916.A web calculator (https://share.streamlit.io/liuwencai4/renal_lnm/main/renal_lnm.py) were built based on the XGB model. Based on the PDF and CUC, we suggested 54.6% as a threshold probability for guiding the diagnosis of LNM, which could distinguish about 89% of LNM patients.ConclusionsThe predictive tool based on machine learning can precisely indicate the probability of LNM in kidney cancer patients and has a satisfying application prospect in clinical practice.

Background. This study aimed at establishing and validating a quantitative and visual prognosis model of Ewing Sarcoma (E.S.) via a nomogram. This model was developed to predict the risk of lung metastasis (L.M.) in patients with E.S. to provide a practical tool and help in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods. Data of all patients diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A training dataset from the enrolled cohorts was built (n = 929). Predictive factors for L.M. were identified based on the results of multivariable logistic regression analyses. A nomogram model and a web calculator were constructed based on those key predictors. A multicenter dataset from four medical institutions was established for model validation (n = 51). The predictive ability of the nomogram model was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration plot. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to explain the accuracy of the nomogram model in clinical practice. Results. Five independent factors, including survival time, surgery, tumor (T) stage, node (N) stage, and bone metastasis, were identified to develop a nomogram model. Internal and external validation indicated significant predictive discrimination: the area under the ROC curve (AUC) value was 0.769 (95% CI: 0.740 to 0.795) in the training cohort and 0.841 (95% CI: 0.712 to 0.929) in the validation cohort, respectively. Calibration plots and DCA presented excellent performance of the nomogram model with great clinical utility. Conclusions. In this study, a nomogram model was constructed and validated to predict L.M. in patients with E.S. for medical human-computer interface—a web calculator (https://drliwenle.shinyapps.io/LMESapp/). This practical tool could help clinicians make better decisions to provide precision prognosis and treatment for patients with E.S.