Zearalenone (ZEN) is a ubiquitous contaminant in poultry feed, since ZEN and its metabolites can interfere with estrogen function and affect the reproductive ability of animals. The estrogen-like effect of ZEN on mammal is widely reported, while little information is available, regarding the effect of relatively low dose of ZEN on estrogen function and production performance of laying hens, and the relationship between them. This work was aimed to investigate the effects of ZEN on the production performance, egg quality, ovarian function and gut microbiota of laying hens. A total of 96 Hy-line brown laying hens aged 25-week were randomly divided into 3 groups including basal diet group (BD group), basal diet supplemented with 250 μg/kg (250 μg/kg ZEN group) and 750 μg/kg (750 μg/kg ZEN group) ZEN group. Here, 750 μg/kg ZEN resulted in a significant increase in the feed conversion ratio (FCR) (g feed/g egg) (p < 0.05), a decrease in the egg production (p > 0.05), albumen height and Haugh unit (p > 0.05), compared to the BD group. The serum Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels significantly decreased in ZEN supplemented groups (p < 0.05). Serum Luteinizing hormone (LH) and Progesterone (P) levels in the 750 μg/kg ZEN group were significantly lower than those in the BD group (p < 0.05). 16S rRNA sequencing indicated that ZEN reduced cecum microbial diversity (p < 0.05) and altered gut microbiota composition. In contrast to 250 μg/kg ZEN, 750 μg/kg ZEN had more dramatic effects on the gut microbiota function. Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed negative correlations between the dominant bacteria of the 750 μg/kg ZEN group and the production performance, egg quality and ovarian function of hens. Overall, ZEN was shown to exert a detrimental effect on production performance, egg quality and ovarian function of laying hens in this study. Moreover, alterations in the composition and function of the gut microbiota induced by ZEN may be involved in the adverse effects of ZEN on laying hens.

Background Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a rare cardiovascular emergency with rapid onset and great harm. Currently, no relevant studies have analyzed the difference in clinical benefits of endovascular repair in patients with TBAD in acute and non-acute stages. To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of endovascular repair in patients with TBAD at different surgical timing. Methods The medical records of 110 patients with TBAD from June 2014 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into an acute group (onset time ≤14 days) and a non-acute group (onset time >14 days) according to the time to surgery, and the two groups were compared in terms of surgery and hospitalization, aortic remodeling, and follow-up results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of TBAD treated with endoluminal repair. Results The proportion of pleural effusion, heart rate, the rate of complete thrombosis of the false lumen and the difference in the maximum diameter of the false lumen in the acute group were higher than those in the non-acute group (P=0.015, <0.001, 0.029, <0.001). The length of hospital stay and the maximum postoperative diameter of the false lumen was lower than in the non-acute group (P=0.001, 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the technical success rate, overlapping stent length, overlapping stent diameter, immediate postoperative contrast type I endoleak, incidence of renal failure, ischemic disease, endoleaks, aortic dilatation, retrograde type A aortic coarctation, and death (P=0.386, 0.551, 0.093, 0.176, 0.223, 0.739, 0.085, 0.098, 0.395, 0.386); coronary artery disease [odds ratio (OR) =6.630, P=0.012], pleural effusion (OR =5.026, P=0.009), non-acute surgery (OR =2.899, P=0.037), and involvement of the abdominal aorta (OR =11.362, P=0.001) were all independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of TBAD treated with endoluminal repair. Conclusions Acute phase endoluminal repair of TBAD may contribute to aortic remodeling, and the prognosis of TBAD patients can be assessed clinically in combination with coronary artery disease, pleural effusion, and involvement of the abdominal aorta for early intervention to reduce the associated mortality.