The pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes The expansion of whole-genome sequencing studies from individual ICGC and TCGA working groups presented the opportunity to undertake a meta-analysis of genomic features across tumour types. To achieve this, the PCAWG Consortium was established. A Technical Working Group implemented the informatics analyses by aggregating the raw sequencing data from different working groups that studied individual tumour types, aligning the sequences to the human genome and delivering a set of high-quality somatic mutation calls for downstream analysis (Extended Data Fig. 1). Given the recent meta-analysis
Overexpression of amplified genes is often associated with the acquisition of resistance to cancer therapeutic agents in vitro. We have identified a similar molecular mechanism in vivo for endocrine treatment failure in human prostate cancer which involves amplification of the androgen receptor (AR) gene. Comparative genomic hybridization shows that amplification of the Xq11-q13 region (the location), is common in tumours recurring during androgen deprivation therapy. We found high-level AR amplification in seven of 23 (30%) recurrent tumours, but in none of the specimens taken from the same patients prior to therapy. Our results suggest that AR amplification emerges during androgen deprivation therapy by facilitating tumour cell growth in low androgen concentrations.
To study the genetic basis of tumor progression, we have screened 37 hormone-refractory prostate carcinomas for genetic changes by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). All recurrent tumors showed genetic aberrations , with a mean total number of changes per tumor of 11.4 (range , 3 to 23). The most common genetic aberrations were losses of 8p (72.5%) , 13q (50%) , 1p (50%) , 22 (45%) , 19 (45%), 10q (42.5%) , and 16q (42.5%) and gains of 8q (72.5%), 7q (40%) , Xq (32.5%) , and 18q (32.5%). The CGH results were further validated with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes for pericentromeric regions of chromosomes 7 , 8 , and 18 as well as probes for caveolin (7q31) , c-myc (8q24) , and bcl-2 (18q21.3). In addition , the samples had previously been analyzed for androgen receptor gene copy number. CGH and FISH results were concordant in 78% of cases. Seventeen of twenty-two tumors showed an increased copy number of c-myc by FISH. However, only 5 of 17 (29%) of the cases showed high-level (more than threefold) amplification. Both CGH and FISH findings suggested that in most of the cases 8q gain involves the whole q-arm of the chromosome. Four of seventeen (24%) cases showed increased copy number of bcl-2 by FISH; however , no high-level amplifications were found. To evaluate the clonal relationship of the primary and recurrent tumors, six primary-recurrent tumor pairs from the same patients were studied by CGH. In three of six cases (50%) , the recurrent tumor had more than one-half of the aberrations found in the corresponding primary tumor , indicating a close clonal relationship. In the rest of the cases , such a linear clonal relationship was less evident. Altogether , these results suggest that recurrent prostate carcinomas are genetically unstable. The resulting heterogeneity may well underlie the poor responsiveness of hormone-refractory tumors to treatment. (Am J Pathol 1998, 153:141-148)Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men in many Western industrialized countries. Despite the improved early diagnosis of prostate cancer, approximately one-third of the patients are still diagnosed at a clinically advanced stage.
Prostate cancer represents a substantial clinical challenge because it is difficult to predict outcome and advanced disease is often fatal. We sequenced the whole genomes of 112 primary and metastatic prostate cancer samples. From joint analysis of these cancers with those from previous studies (930 cancers in total), we found evidence for 22 previously unidentified putative driver genes harboring coding mutations, as well as evidence for NEAT1 and FOXA1 acting as drivers through noncoding mutations. Through the temporal dissection of aberrations, we identified driver mutations specifically associated with steps in the progression of prostate cancer, establishing, for example, loss of CHD1 and BRCA2 as early events in cancer development of ETS fusion-negative cancers. Computational chemogenomic (canSAR) analysis of prostate cancer mutations identified 11 targets of approved drugs, 7 targets of investigational drugs, and 62 targets of compounds that may be active and should be considered candidates for future clinical trials.
To understand functional consequences of genetic and transcriptional aberrations in prostate cancer, the proteomic changes during disease formation and progression need to be revealed. Here we report high-throughput mass spectrometry on clinical tissue samples of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), untreated primary prostate cancer (PC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Each sample group shows a distinct protein profile. By integrative analysis we show that, especially in CRPC, gene copy number, DNA methylation, and RNA expression levels do not reliably predict proteomic changes. Instead, we uncover previously unrecognized molecular and pathway events, for example, several miRNA target correlations present at protein but not at mRNA level. Notably, we identify two metabolic shifts in the citric acid cycle (TCA cycle) during prostate cancer development and progression. Our proteogenomic analysis uncovers robustness against genomic and transcriptomic aberrations during prostate cancer progression, and significantly extends understanding of prostate cancer disease mechanisms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.