Semmens, J. M., Pecl, G. T., Gillanders, B. M., Waluda, C. M., Shea, E. K., Jouffre, D., Ichii, T., Zumholz, K., Katugin, O. N., Leporati, S. C., Shaw, P. W. (2007). Approaches to resolving cephalopod movement and migration patterns. Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 17 (2-3), 401-423.Cephalopod movement occurs during all phases of the life history, with the abundance and location of cephalopod populations strongly influenced by the prevalence and scale of their movements. Environmental parameters, such as sea temperature and oceanographic processes, have a large influence on movement at the various life cycle stages, particularly those of oceanic squid. Tag recapture studies are the most common way of directly examining cephalopod movement, particularly in species which are heavily fished. Electronic tags, however, are being more commonly used to track cephalopods, providing detailed small- and large-scale movement information. Chemical tagging of paralarvae through maternal transfer may prove to be a viable technique for tracking this little understood cephalopod life stage, as large numbers of individuals could be tagged at once. Numerous indirect methods can also be used to examine cephalopod movement, such as chemical analyses of the elemental and/or isotopic signatures of cephalopod hard parts, with growing interest in utilising these techniques for elucidating migration pathways, as is commonly done for fish. Geographic differences in parasite fauna have also been used to indirectly provide movement information, however, explicit movement studies require detailed information on parasite-host specificity and parasite geographic distribution, which is yet to be determined for cephalopods. Molecular genetics offers a powerful approach to estimating realised effective migration rates among populations, and continuing developments in markers and analytical techniques hold the promise of more detailed identification of migrants. To date genetic studies indicate that migration in squids is extensive but can be blocked by major oceanographic features, and in cuttlefish and octopus migration is more locally restricted than predictions from life history parameters would suggest. Satellite data showing the location of fishing lights have been increasingly used to examine the movement of squid fishing vessels, as a proxy for monitoring the movement of the squid populations themselves, allowing for the remote monitoring of oceanic species.Peer reviewe

We describe the feeding habits of 70 blue sharks (Prionace glauca) and 39 salmon sharks (Lamna ditropis) caught at 0-7 m depth at night by research drift gillnets in the transition region of the western North Pacific during AprilMay of 1999 and 2000. Blue sharks of 50-175 cm total length fed on a large variety of prey species, consisting of 24 species of cephalopods and 16 species of fishes. Salmon sharks of 69-157 cm total length fed on a few prey species, consisting of 10 species of cephalopods and one species of fish. Important prey for the blue sharks were large, non-active, gelatinous, meso-to bathypelagic cephalopods (e.g., Chiroteuthis calyx, Haliphron atlanticus, Histioteuthis dofleini and Belonella borealis) and small myctophid fishes. Important prey for the salmon sharks were midsized, active, muscular, epi-to mesopelagic squids (e.g. Gonatopsis borealis, Onychoteuthis borealijaponica and Berryteuthis anonychus). Our results suggest that blue sharks feed on cephalopods mainly during the daytime when they descend to deep water. Salmon sharks may feed opportunistically with no apparent diurnal feeding period. Blue sharks and salmon sharks have sympatric distribution in the transition region in spring; they have different feeding habits and strategies that reduce competition for food resources.

No abstract

ABSTRACT:We examined the feeding habits of the neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii from late spring to mid-summer in relation to its northward migration in the transitional waters of the central North Pacific. The winter-spring cohort (ca. 15 to 25 cm in May and 20 to 35 cm in July) and the autumn cohort (ca. 30 to 45 cm in May and 35 to 50 cm in July) were identified by their dorsal mantle lengths. In May and July, the winter-spring cohort was distributed only in the transition zone (TZ) south of the subarctic boundary. This cohort preyed primarily on crustaceans such as euphausiids and amphipods in May, but in July, their primary prey shifted to the sternoptychid fish Maurolicus imperatorius. In May, the larger-sized autumn cohort was also distributed only in the TZ, but in July, these individuals migrated to the transitional domain (TD) north of the subarctic boundary. The main prey of the autumn cohort were micronektonic animals that dominated the TZ in May: the transitionalwater myctophid Symbolophorus californiensis, and 2 subtropical myctophids, Ceratoscopelus warmingi and Electrona risso. Secondary important prey items included the transitional-water squid Onychoteuthis borealijaponica and subarctic gonatid squids such as Gonatus berryi and Berryteuthis anonychus. In July, the main prey species in the TD were S. californiensis and O. borealijaponica, both of which also migrated from the TZ into the TD, crossing the subarctic boundary in summer. We estimated the feeding impact of the autumn squid cohort on myctophids in the TD during summer.