Background: Implanting a ventricular demand leadless pacemaker (VVI-LPM) for patients with non-atrial fibrillation (AF) bradyarrhythmias such as sick sinus syndrome (SSS) or high-grade (i.e., second-or third-degree) atrioventricular (AV) block is not recommended unless they have limited vascular access or a high infection risk; nevertheless, an unexpectedly high number of VVI-LPM implantations have been performed. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of these unusual uses. Methods and Results:This study retrospectively analyzed 193 patients who were newly implanted with a VVI-LPM or an atrioventricular synchronous transvenous pacemaker (DDD-TPM) for non-AF bradyarrhythmias at a high-volume center in Japan from September 2017 to September 2020. Propensity score-matching produced 2 comparable cohorts treated with a VVI-LPM or DDD-TPM (n=58 each). Each group had 20 (34%) patients with SSS and 38 (66%) patients with high-grade AV block. During a median follow up of 733 (interquartile range 395−997) days, there were no significant differences between the VVI-LPM and DDD-TPM groups regarding late device-related adverse events (0% vs. 4%, log-rank P=0.155), but the VVI-LPM group had a significantly increased readmission rate for heart failure (HF) (29% vs. 2%, log-rank P=0.001) and a tendency to have higher all-cause mortality (28% vs. 4%, log-rank P=0.059). Conclusions:The implantation of a VVI-LPM for non-AF bradyarrhythmias increased the incidence of HF-related rehospitalization at the mid-term follow up compared to the use of a DDD-TPM.

A 72-year-old male with effort angina pectoris and old myocardial infarction underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A 4 Fr sheath was inserted in the radial artery. After diagnostic angiography, a guidewire was inserted from the diagnostic catheter. The diagnostic catheter is removed, and the distal tip of the guidewire remains in the coronary artery. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) could be performed via the 4 Fr sheath without guiding catheters. IVUS-guide PCI was successfully performed with 4 Fr sheath, although IVUS requires at least a 5 Fr or larger system. This technique is called "The Emperor's New Clothes Technique" because PCI is performed as if an invisible guiding catheter was being used.

Ventricular-demand leadless pacemakers (VVI-LPMs) have often been used as an alternative to atrioventricular (AV) synchronous transvenous pacemakers (DDD-TPMs) in patients with high-grade AV block following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the clinical outcomes of this unusual usage are not elucidated. Patients who received permanent pacemakers (PPMs) owing to new-onset high-grade AV block after TAVR from September 2017 to August 2020 at a high-volume center in Japan were included in the analysis, and the clinical courses of VVI-LPM and DDD-TPM implants through 2 years of follow-up were compared retrospectively. Out of 413 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR, 51 (12%) patients received a PPM. After excluding 8 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF), 3 with sick sinus syndrome, and 1 with incomplete data, 17 VVI-LPMs and 22 DDD-TPMs were included in our final cohort. The VVI-LPM group had lower serum albumin levels (3.2 ± 0.5 vs. 3.9 ± 0.4 g/dL, P < .01) than the DDD-TPM group. Follow-up revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of the incidence of late device-related adverse events (0% vs. 5%, log-rank P = .38) and new-onset AF (6% vs. 9%, log-rank P = .75); however, there were increases in the rates of all-cause death (41% vs. 5%, log-rank P < .01) and heart failure rehospitalization (24% vs. 0%, log-rank P = .01) in the VVI-LPM group. This small retrospective study reveals favorable post-procedural complication rates but higher all-cause mortality with VVI-LPM compared to DDD-TPM therapy for high-grade AV block after TAVR at 2 years of follow-up.

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a rare, potentially fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction. When surgical closure is contraindicated, transcatheter closure may be an alternative. Residual shunting after transcatheter closure of postinfarction VSDs has been reported; however, we found few cases of this in patients who also had severe heart failure or hemolysis. We report 2 closures of postinfarction VSDs with use of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder. Both elderly patients—one with severe heart failure, one with persistent hemolysis, and neither a surgical candidate—had high-velocity residual shunting through the occluders. We intensively managed the patients' conditions and used angiography and transthoracic echocardiography to record the gradual disappearance of each shunt over 4 months—the first such serial monitoring of which we are aware. We think that even substantial shunting in the presence of severe heart failure or hemolysis can eventually resolve spontaneously, assuming effective management of the concomitant medical conditions.