No abstract

IntroductionAs the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread across the globe, hospitals around the USA began preparing for its arrival. Building on previous experience with alternative care sites (ACS) during surge events, Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) opted to redeploy their mobile paediatric emergency response teams. Simulation-based clinical systems testing (SbCST) uses simulation to test preoccupancy spaces and new processes. We developed rapid SbCST with social distancing for our deployed ACS, with collaboration between emergency management, paediatric emergency medicine and the simulation team.MethodsA two-phased approach included an initial virtual tabletop activity followed by SbCST at each campus, conducted simultaneously in-person and virtually. These activities were completed while also respecting the need for social distancing amidst a pandemic response. Each activity’s discussion was facilitated using Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) for systems integration debriefing methodology and was followed by compilation of a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), which was then disseminated to campus leaders.ResultsWithin a 2-week period, participants from 20 different departments identified 109 latent safety threats (LSTs) across the four activities, with 71 identified as being very high or high priority items. Very high and high priority threats were prioritised in mitigation efforts by hospital leadership.DiscussionSbCST can be rapidly implemented to hone pandemic responses and identify LSTs. We used SbCST to allow for virtual participation and social distancing within a rapidly accelerated timeline. With prioritised FMEA reporting, leadership was able to mitigate concerns surrounding the four Ss of surge capacity: staff, stuff, structure and systems.

Suicide is a leading cause of death among children and adolescents, and research has shown a significant increase in the rates of emergency department (ED) visits because of suicide ideation and attempts for children younger than 18 years.ObjectiveThis study examined the feasibility of screening all patients entering the ED using the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale as well as examining the rates of suicide ideation and attempts endorsed by adolescents who present at the ED.MethodsThis study used a sample of 12,113 patients between the ages of 11 and 19 years.ResultsResults revealed that 13.5% of the participants endorsed passive suicide ideation in the month leading up to their ED visit and 11.3% of the participants reported active ideation in the prior month. Results also revealed that patients whose chief complaints were coded as psychiatric or medical trauma were more likely to endorse either active or passive suicidal ideation than other presenting problems. Patients with a psychiatric or medical trauma chief complaint were also more likely to report lifetime suicidal behavior and suicidal behavior 3 months before the ED visit.ConclusionsIn addition to findings, implications, feasibility, and lessons learned are discussed for other institutions or departments considering implementation of a widespread screening.Highlights:• Suicide screenings were implemented in a large pediatric emergency department.• One in 5 endorsed suicidal ideation or behavior regardless of presenting problem.• Feasibility and lessons learned are discussed for others hoping to implement a widespread screening.

No abstract