No abstract

Plerixafor augments PBSC collection, but the optimal approach for incorporating it into mobilization is uncertain. Forty-nine consecutive patients mobilized with G-CSF alone were analyzed, and a day 4 peripheral blood CD34 þ cell count of 0.015/ml was found to predict for a day 5 apheresis yield of 2 Â 10 6 CD34 þ progenitors/kg, our institutional minimum necessary for a single autologous transplant. On the basis of this relationship, a clinical guideline was developed which recommended pre-emptive use of plerixafor if the day 4 peripheral blood CD34 þ cell count was between 0.005 and 0.015/ml. A total of 166 consecutive subjects with lymphoma or plasma cell dyscrasias underwent G-CSF mobilization after adoption of this care pathway, and the mobilization failure rate was only 7% in patients managed per guideline. The median PBSC yield was 6.3 Â 10 6 CD34 þ progenitors/kg with G-CSF (day 4 peripheral blood CD34 þ cell40.015/ml) and 4.9 Â 10 6 CD34 þ progenitors/kg with G-CSF þ plerixafor (day 4 peripheral blood CD34 þ cell 0.005-0.015/ml). The median number of days of apheresis was 2 in both groups. This clinical guideline is an effective mobilization algorithm that minimizes mobilization failures, reduces poor apheresis yields, does not require risk factor identification and is simple to implement.

High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT) is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma, although the optimal conditioning regimen remains uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent autoSCT between 1998 and 2009. There were 60 patients who received busulfan, melphalan and thiotepa (BuMelTt) conditioning and 40 who received other common regimens. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 4.3 years, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was superior for patients who received BuMelTt versus other conditioning (73% vs. 44%, p = 0.05). BuMelTt was also associated with an improved 5-year progression-free survival (66% vs. 37%, p = 0.03). There were no differences in length of hospitalization, febrile neutropenia, hepatic veno-occlusive disease or 100-day non-relapse mortality (NRM). There were more cases of severe mucositis but fewer episodes of bacteremia with BuMelTt. Our results suggest that BuMelTt may be a superior conditioning regimen for autoSCT in Hodgkin lymphoma.

No abstract

No abstract