The 3 G/3 G genotype of the TYMS gene may indicate predisposition of poor response to MTX and GG genotype of GGH -354 T > G polymorphism may have high predictive value for myelosuppression in RA patients.
IntroductionAssuming that spina bifida (SB) is a genetically controlled disease, the aim of our study was to evaluate the degree of genetic homozygosity and the distribution of AB0 blood types among patients with SB occulta and SB aperta by the homozygously recessive characteristics (HRC) test.Material and methodsOur study included an analysis of the presence, distribution and individual combination of 15 selected genetically controlled morpho-physiological traits in a sample of 100 patients with SB (SB occulta N = 50 and SB aperta N = 50) and a control group of individuals (N = 100).ResultsWe found a statistically significant difference between the mean values for genetic homozygosity (SB 4.5 ±0.3; control 3.0 ±0.2, p < 0.001) and also differences in the presence of certain individual combinations of such traits. In 12 (80.0%) of the 15 observed characteristics, recessive homozygosity was expressed to a greater degree among the group of SB patients, while for 9 (60.0%) of the traits this level of difference was statistically significant (Σχ 2 = 266.3, p < 0.001). There was no difference in average homozygosity of such genetic markers between groups of SB occulta and SB aperta patients, but the type of individual variation in the two studied groups significantly differed. In the group of patients with SB the frequency of 0 blood group was significantly increased while B blood group was significantly decreased.ConclusionsOur results clearly show that there is a populational genetic difference in the degree of genetic homozygosity and variability between the group of patients with SB and individuals without clinical manifestations, indicating a possible genetic component in the aetiopathogenesis of spina bifida.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has an important role in energy balance. It suppresses food intake, reduces hepatic glucose production and converts white fat into brown fat in adipose tissue, leading to energy dissipation, lowered blood glucose and a lean phenotype. Studies have shown that the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Val66Met within BDNF may be associated with obesity, insulin sensitivity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and dyslipidemia. The objective of the study was to investigate the association of the Val66Met polymorphism with body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose levels and lipid profile in Serbian adolescents. The study included 308 randomly selected healthy adolescents, 153 (49.68%) boys and 155 girls (50.32%), 15 years of age. Data including age, gender, height, weight, lipid profile and fasting glucose were recorded. Genotyping was performed by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. No association of this polymorphism was found with BMI and lipid profile. However, significant association was observed between this polymorphism and fasting blood glucose (FBG). Carriers of a Val/Val genotype had significantly higher mean values of fasting glucose level compared to carriers of Val/ Met and Met/Met genotypes (p = 0.01). To confirm these results multiple linear regression analysis was performed. Body mass index and gender were taken as covariates. Carriers of the Val/Val genotype had significantly higher levels of FBG (β = -0.152, p = 0.02). A statistically significant association between BMI and glucose level was also observed (β = 0.124,p = 0.033). This polymorphism could be associated with fasting glucose level in Serbian adolescents, thus further research would be of great interest to validate these results.
Background Array‐based genomic analysis is a gold standard for the detection of copy number variations (CNVs) as an important source of benign as well as pathogenic variations in humans. The introduction of chromosomal microarray (CMA) has led to a significant leap in diagnostics of genetically caused congenital malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders, with an average diagnostic yield of 15%. Here, we present our experience from a single laboratory perspective in four years’ postnatal clinical CMA application. Methods DNA samples of 430 patients with congenital anomalies and/or neurodevelopmental disorders were analyzed by comparative genome hybridization using oligonucleotide‐based microarray platforms. Interpretation of detected CNVs was performed according to current guidelines. The detection rate (DR) of clinically significant findings (pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs) was calculated for the whole cohort and isolated or combined phenotypic categories. Results A total of 140 non‐benign CNVs were detected in 113/430 patients (26.5%). In 70 patients at least one CNV was considered clinically significant thus reaching a diagnostic yield of 16.3%. The more complex the phenotype, including developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID) as a prevailing feature, the higher the DR of clinically significant CNVs is obtained. Isolated congenital anomalies had the lowest, while the “dysmorphism plus” category had the highest diagnostic yield. Conclusion In our study, CMA proved to be a very useful method in the diagnosis of genetically caused congenital anomalies and neurodevelopmental disorders. DD/ID and dysmorphism stand out as important phenotypic features that significantly increase the diagnostic yield of the analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.