Hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC) accounts for < 5% of all colorectal cancer cases. Some of the unique characteristics commonly encountered in HCRC cases include early age of onset, synchronous/metachronous cancer occurrence, and multiple cancers in other organs. These characteristics necessitate different management approaches, including diagnosis, treatment or surveillance, from sporadic colorectal cancer management. There are two representative HCRC, named familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch syndrome. Other than these two HCRC syndromes, related disorders have also been reported. Several guidelines for hereditary disorders have already been published worldwide. In Japan, the first guideline for HCRC was prepared by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR), published in 2012 and revised in 2016. This revised version of the guideline was immediately translated into English and published in 2017. Since then, several new findings and novel disease concepts related to HCRC have been discovered. The currently diagnosed HCRC rate in daily clinical practice is relatively low; however, this is predicted to increase in the era of cancer genomic medicine, with the advancement of cancer multi-gene panel testing or whole genome testing, among others. Under these circumstances, the JSCCR guidelines 2020 for HCRC were prepared by consensus among members of the JSCCR HCRC Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved from literature searches, and considering the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Herein, we present the English version of the JSCCR guidelines 2020 for HCRC.

No abstract

-diacetylspermine (DiAcSpm) in the urine of colorectal and breast cancer patients was examined to establish its usefulness as a novel diagnostic tool for detecting these cancers at clinically early stages. Experimental Design: Urine samples from 248 colon cancer patients and 83 breast cancer patients as well as 51patients with benign gastrointestinal diseases treated inTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital during the period of August1999 toJanuary 2004 were collected. DiAcSpm was analyzed by ELISA and its sensitivity for malignant conditions was compared with that of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA19-9, and CA15-3. Results: The sensitivity of urinary DiAcSpm for colon cancer patients (n = 248) was 75.8% (mean F 2 SD for 52 healthy controls as a cutoff value), which was markedly higher than the sensitivities of serum CEA (39.5%, P < 0.0001) and CA19-9 (14.1%, P < 0.0001). DiAcSpm was elevated in 60% of tumor-node-metastasis cancer stage 0 + I patients, whereas only 10% (P < 0.0001) and 5% (P < 0.0001) of these patients were CEA-and CA19-9^positive, respectively.The sensitivity of urinary DiAcSpm for 83 cases of breast cancer (60.2%) was higher than the sensitivities of CEA (37.3%, P = 0.0032) and CA15-3 (37.3%, P = 0.0032). DiAcSpm was elevated in 28% of tumor-node-metastasis stage I + II patients, whereas only 3% (P = 0.0064) and 0% (P = 0.001) of these patients were CEA-and CA15-3^positive, respectively. Conclusion:The observations indicate that urinary DiAcSpm is a more sensitive marker than CEA, CA19-9, and CA15-3 and that it can efficiently detect colorectal and breast cancers at early stages.We reported previously that N 1 ,N 12 -diacetylspermine (DiAcSpm) is excreted in the urine of healthy persons, with small individual variations in the amount (1). We devised a high-performance liquid chromatography separation system connected to an in-line enzymatic detection system for DiAcSpm and carried out precise analyses of urinary DiAcSpm in healthy persons as well as patients with malignant diseases.Our analysis revealed that DiAcSpm may be useful as a novel diagnostic and prognostic tumor marker in that its excretion in urine is elevated significantly and frequently in patients with urogenital malignancies and tends to recover to the normal level on remission (2, 3). At the same time, we noted that monoacetylpolyamines that constitute a major part of urinary polyamines, including N-acetylputrescine, N 1 -acetylspermidine, and N 8 -acetylspermidine, were much less sensitive as markers for these urogenital malignancies than DiAcSpm and could not be considered practical tumor markers. The part of our observations concerning conventional monoacetylpolyamines was very well in accord with the popular evaluation of urinary polyamines at that time (4), but our results on DiAcSpm analysis were radically different from those on other polyamine derivatives and looked highly promising (2, 3).Although the biochemistry and clinical chemistry of DiAcSpm remain largely obscure at present because of the lack of intensiv...

BackgroundCombination therapy with oral fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan has not yet been established as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We carried out a randomized, open-label, phase III trial to determine whether S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab is noninferior to mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab in terms of progression-free survival (PFS).Patients and methodsPatients from 53 institutions who had previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive either mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab (control group) or S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (experimental group; a 3-week regimen: intravenous infusions of irinotecan 150 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1, oral S-1 80 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest; or a 4-week regimen: irinotecan 100 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15, S-1 80 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest). The primary end point was PFS. The noninferiority margin was 1.25; noninferiority would be established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the hazard ratio (HR) of the control group versus the experimental group was less than this margin.ResultBetween June 2012 and September 2014, 487 patients underwent randomization. Two hundred and forty-three patients assigned to the control group and 241 assigned to the experimental group were included in the primary analysis. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI 9.6–11.6) in the control group and 14.0 months (95% CI 12.4–15.5) in the experimental group (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70–1.02; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority, P = 0.0815 for superiority). One hundred and fifty-seven patients (64.9%) in the control group and 140 (58.6%) in the experimental group had adverse events of grade 3 or higher.ConclusionS-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab is noninferior to mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab with respect to PFS as first-line treatment of mCRC and could be a new standard treatment.Clinical trials numberUMIN000007834

Neurosurgical resection in select patients is a reasonable option for brain metastasis from colorectal cancer, although it is not associated with long-term (5-year) survival. (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A121 ).