Herpes simplex virus is responsible for numerous ocular diseases, the most common of which is herpetic stromal keratitis. This is a recurrent infection of the cornea that typically begins with a subclinical infection of the cornea that establishes a latent infection of sensory ganglia, most often the trigeminal ganglia. Recurring infections occur when the virus is reactivated from latency and travels back to the cornea, where it restimulates an inflammatory response. This inflammatory response can lead to decreased corneal sensation, scarring, and blindness. The diagnosis of these lesions as the result of a recurrent herpes simplex virus infection can at times be problematic. Currently, herpetic stromal keratitis is diagnosed by its clinical presentation on the slit-lamp examination, but the literature does not always support the accuracy of these clinical findings. Other diagnostic tests such as polymerase chain reaction assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunofluorescent antibody, and viral cultures have provided more definitive diagnosis, but also have some limitations. That said, accurate diagnosis is necessary for proper treatment, in order to prevent serious consequences. Current treatment reduces the severity of lesions and controls further viral spread, but does not provide a cure.

Herpes simplex keratitis is a disease of the cornea caused by HSV-1. It is a leading cause of corneal blindness in the world. Underlying molecular mechanism is still unknown, but experimental models have helped give a better understanding of the underlying molecular pathology. Cytokines and chemokines are small proteins released by cells that play an important proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory role in modulating the disease process. Cytokines such as IL-17, IL-6, IL-1α, and IFN-γ and chemokines such as MIP-2, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β have proinflammatory role in the destruction caused by HSV including neutrophil infiltration and corneal inflammation, and other chemokines and cytokines such as IL-10 and CCL3 can have a protective role. Most of the damage results from neutrophil infiltration and neovascularization. While many more studies are needed to better understand the role of these molecules in both experimental models and human corneas, current studies indicate that these molecules hold potential to be targets of future therapy.

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between topical tacrolimus and oral tacrolimus as the primary calcineurin inhibitor for postoperative immunosuppression after primary keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).Methods: We performed a retrospective, comparative cohort study at a single tertiary referral center (University of MN) of all patients who underwent primary KLAL between 2014 and 2021. Eyes were grouped into those which received topical tacrolimus as the only calcineurin inhibitor (topical group) and eyes in which patients received oral tacrolimus with or without topical tacrolimus (oral group). Clinical and donor tissue data were obtained and compared between the 2 groups.Results: In total, 27 eyes of 22 patients (median age 42 years, range 20-79 years) were included, of which 18 eyes were in the oral group and 9 eyes were in the topical group. The mean follow-up time was 33.2 6 22.6 months. The most frequent etiology of LSCD was alkaline burn (33.3%). At 36 months, graft failure occurred in 6 eyes in the oral group (33.3%) and 2 eyes in the topical group (22.1%) (P = 0.57). The failure rate in the oral group was 9.1 per 1000 person-months versus 8.4 per 1000 person-months in the topical group (P = 0.96). The median improvement in BCVA was logMAR 20.975 and logMAR 20.45 for the oral and topical group, respectively (P = 0.50).Conclusions: With careful patient selection, topical tacrolimus may be a viable alternative to oral tacrolimus in KLAL.