No abstract

The prophylactic use of amiodarone to reduce the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias is effective for patients undergoing general cardiac surgeries; however, no data exists for the use of prophylactic amiodarone to prevent postoperative arrhythmias after CF-LVAD. This single-center, retrospective analysis compared patients with CF-LVADs placed between April 2014 and June 2020 who received prophylactic postoperative amiodarone to those who did not. Based on institution practice at the respective times, patients with a CF-LVAD placed between April 2014 and June 2018 were included in the group receiving postoperative amiodarone arrhythmia prophylaxis and patients with a CF-LVAD placed July 2018 to June 2020 were included in the group not receiving arrhythmia prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the incidence of first occurring atrial or ventricular arrhythmia from CF-LVAD placement to 21 days or hospital discharge. Sixty patients received amiodarone for arrhythmia prophylaxis and 27 patients did not receive prophylaxis. The primary outcome occurred in 40% of the prophylaxis group and 66.7% in the no prophylaxis group (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.90; p = 0.038). In patients receiving CF-LVADs, the use of prophylactic amiodarone was associated with a reduction in the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias, which was driven primarily by a reduction in postoperative atrial arrhythmias, without significantly increasing the rate of amiodarone-related adverse events.

No abstract

Background: Patients living with HIV (PLWH) with multi-drug resistance (MDR) and prior episodes of virologic failure have few therapeutic options remaining. These patients are often prescribed ‘salvage’ antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens with high pill burdens, leading to potential decreased medication adherence and increased side effects and drug–drug interactions. Materials & Methods: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we included adult patients with a diagnosis of HIV-1 who received care at our institution’s Ryan White Clinic and who received ‘salvage’ ART, defined as three of more antiretroviral agents from at least three different HIV drug classes. Patients were grouped into two cohorts, simplified ART cohort and non-simplified ART cohort, based on whether their ART regimen was reduced by at least one tablet daily. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who had their viral load suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml) at their most recent clinic visit. Secondary outcomes were virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA ⩾200 copies/ml), percentage of time patients were virologically suppressed over the past 2 years, and the emergence of new treatment-resistant mutations. Results: There were 50 patients included in the final analysis, 28 in the simplified ART cohort and 22 in the non-simplified ART cohort. The percentage of patients who had their HIV-1 viral load suppressed at their most recent clinic visit was n = 24 (86%) in the simplified ART cohort and n = 16 (73%) in the non-simplified ART cohort ( p = 0.302). There were no statistically significant differences between the two cohorts in terms of the secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Our study found that simplification of ART regimens based on HIV genotype in PLWH with a history of MDR and prior virologic failures, regardless of the presence of HIV-1 viremia at the time of simplification, resulted in similar rates of virologic suppression and virologic failure as non-simplified ART regimens.