The symbolic interactionist tradition can contribute to advancing sociological studies of cognition by setting dual process models on more solid ground. I draw on Blumer's epistemological statements and the interactionist tradition more broadly to consider how dual process models of cognition could be applied to naturally occurring situations. I suggest that attending to the ways the past and the future are handled and modified within social interaction provides a usable inroad for the sociology of cognition to engage with situational analysis. I identify “resonance” and “iterative reprocessing” as concepts that are suitable to this end.
Open access publishing is an increasingly popular trend in the dissemination of academic work, allowing journals to print articles electronically and without the burden of subscription paywalls, enabling much wider access for audiences. Yet subscription-based journals remain the most dominant in the social sciences and humanities, and it is often a struggle for newer open access publications to compete, in terms of economic, cultural, and symbolic capital (Bourdieu, 2004). Our study explores the meanings of resistance held by the editors of open access journals in the social sciences and humanities in Canada, as well as the views of university librarians. To make sense of these meanings, we draw on Lonnie Athens’ (2015) radical interactionist account of power, and expand on this by incorporating George Herbert Mead’s (1932, 1938) theory of emergence, arguing that open access is characteristic of an “extended rationality” (Chang, 2004) for those involved. Drawing on our open-ended interview data, we find that open access is experienced as a form of resistance in at least four ways. These include resistance to (1) profit motives in academic publishing; (2) access barriers for audiences; (3) access barriers for contributors; and (4) traditional publishing conventions.
Chess, as a game and principle of organized social activity, has existed for nearly 1300 years. In Players and Pawns: How Chess Builds Community and Culture, Gary Alan Fine provides an ethnographic account of chess as a soft and sticky cultural activity that "drips with tradition and is laminated with meaning" (66). The theoretical backbone of this book explains community and culture by leaning heavily on metaphors of touch. Communities are "soft" when pure and simple devotion is the main requirement for entry and sustained membership. On the other hand, culture is "sticky" when devoted members share detailed understandings about styles of interaction, formal constraints, legendary moments, communal rankings or hierarchies, icons, and broad historical narratives (102-3; see also Fine 2013). A soft community with a sticky culture is cozy; through intense practice and study, individual devotees nestle themselves into a particular social activity and find comfort in their collectively shared values and experiences. Fine explores and substantiates his abstract concepts with rich references to organized chess competitions-though the theoretical concepts he introduces are still in need of further exploration and demarcation across leisurely and professional cultural practices. Through the use of tactile metaphors, communities can be conceived along a continuum of hardness and softness while cultures can be conceived similarly as stickier or slipperier.Fine's study draws upon 5 years of ethnographic observations within domains of chessic activity in New York City and Chicago, ranging from international competitions to those between scholastic players. These ethnographic observations are supplemented by 50 interviews with chess players from the United States and Canada, as well as an extensive review of the literature on chess. As a seasoned ethnographer and self-described outsider in this community, Fine unpacks local patterns of interaction unique to the "chessworld" while paying serious attention to the intersections of chess with other communities and institutions. The book's trajectory moves from considering the body of the player at the board to the institutional atmosphere that surrounds and impinges upon the chess community. More specifically, the chapters Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 41, Issue 3, pp. 418-420, ISSN: 0195-6086 print/1533-8665 online.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.