No abstract

1 Pentagastrin and cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK8) were infused i.v. at three different doses in two sets of 4 conscious rabbits following a repeated measurements design (130, 1,300 and 13,000 pmol kg-' min-' pentagastrin; 5, 50 and 450 pmol kg-' min-' CCK8). In man, two different doses of pentagastrin (13 and 65 pmol kg-' min-') were infused in two groups of 6 subjects, and CCK8 (2 pmol kg-' min-') in a third group. According to published human postprandial levels, plasma CCK8-like immunoreactivity concentrations were supraphysiological at all doses infused. 2 In the rabbit, pentagastrin produced a dose-related fall in urine flow and free water clearance, but no significant change in systemic and renal haemodynamics, electrolyte excretion and measured plasma constituents; however, in human subjects, pentagastrin increased renal sodium excretion and reduced potassium excretion but did not change glomerular filtration rate. 3 In the rabbit, CCK8 produced a dose-related fall in plasma renin activity, plasma calcium concentration and mean arterial blood pressure; dose-dependent increases in effective renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate and renal sodium excretion. In man, changes in sodium and potassium excretion similar to pentagastrin were observed; there were no significant changes in plasma renin activity, plasma calcium concentration, blood pressure, effective renal plasma flow or glomerular filtration rate. 4 The pharmacological renal effects of pentagastrin in conscious water-loaded rabbits resemble vasopressin. In contrast, CCK8's most striking effect was vasodilatation and was unusual in inhibiting rather than stimulating renin release. In man the net changes in urine composition found during infusion of these peptides are similar to those produced by the potassium-sparing diuretics, amiloride and triamterene. However the generally weak renal effects observed, even at pharmacological doses, indicate that these peptides are unlikely to influence renal function under normal physiological conditions.

Insect segmentation is a well-studied and tractable system with which to investigate the genetic regulation of development. Though insects segment their germband using a variety of methods, modelling work implies that a single gene regulatory network can underpin the two main types of insect segmentation. This means limited genetic changes are required to explain significant differences in segmentation mode between different insects. Evidence for this idea is limited to Drosophila melanogaster, Tribolium castaneum, and the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum, and the nature of the gene regulatory network (GRN) underlying this model has not been tested. Some insects, for example Nasonia vitripennis and Apis mellifera segment progressively, a pattern not examined in studies of this segmentation model, producing stripes at different times throughout the embryo, but not from a segment addition zone. Here we aim to understand the GRNs patterning Nasonia using a simulation-based approach. We found that an existing model of Drosophila segmentation (Clark 2017) can be used to recapitulate Nasonia's progressive segmentation, if provided with altered inputs in the form of expression of the timer genes Nv-caudal and Nv-odd paired. We also predict limited topological changes to the pair rule network. Together this implies that very limited changes to the Drosophila network are required to simulate Nasonia segmentation, despite the differences in segmentation modes, implying that Nasonia use a very similar version of an ancestral GRN also used by Drosophila.

No abstract