Millions of people regularly obtain insufficient sleep1. Given the impact of sleep deprivation on our lives, understanding the cellular and molecular pathways affected by sleep deprivation is clearly of social and clinical importance. One of the major effects of sleep deprivation on the brain is to produce memory deficits in learning paradigms that are dependent on the hippocampus2–5. In this study, we have identified a molecular mechanism by which brief sleep deprivation alters hippocampal function. Sleep deprivation selectively impaired cAMP/PKA-dependent forms of synaptic plasticity6 in the hippocampus, reduced cAMP signaling, and increased activity and protein levels of phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4), an enzyme that degrades cAMP. Treatment with PDE inhibitors rescued the sleep deprivation-induced deficits in cAMP signaling, synaptic plasticity, and hippocampus-dependent memory. These findings demonstrate that brief sleep deprivation disrupts hippocampal function by interfering with cAMP signaling through increased PDE4 activity. Thus drugs that enhance cAMP signaling may provide a novel therapeutic approach to counteract the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation.

Protein kinases play critical roles in learning and memory and in long term potentiation (LTP), a form of synaptic plasticity. The induction of late-phase LTP (L-LTP) in the CA1 region of the hippocampus requires several kinases, including CaMKII and PKA, which are activated by calcium-dependent signaling processes and other intracellular signaling pathways. The requirement for PKA is limited to L-LTP induced using spaced stimuli, but not massed stimuli. To investigate this temporal sensitivity of PKA, a computational biochemical model of L-LTP induction in CA1 pyramidal neurons was developed. The model describes the interactions of calcium and cAMP signaling pathways and is based on published biochemical measurements of two key synaptic signaling molecules, PKA and CaMKII. The model is stimulated using four 100 Hz tetani separated by 3 sec (massed) or 300 sec (spaced), identical to experimental L-LTP induction protocols. Simulations show that spaced stimulation activates more PKA than massed stimulation, and makes a key experimental prediction, that L-LTP is PKA-dependent for intervals larger than 60 sec. Experimental measurements of L-LTP demonstrate that intervals of 80 sec, but not 40 sec, produce PKA-dependent L-LTP, thereby confirming the model prediction. Examination of CaMKII reveals that its temporal sensitivity is opposite that of PKA, suggesting that PKA is required after spaced stimulation to compensate for a decrease in CaMKII. In addition to explaining the temporal sensitivity of PKA, these simulations suggest that the use of several kinases for memory storage allows each to respond optimally to different temporal patterns.

A kinase-anchoring proteins (AKAPs) organize compartmentalized pools of Protein Kinase A (PKA) to enable localized signaling events within neurons. However, it is unclear which of the many expressed AKAPs in neurons target PKA to signaling complexes important for long-lasting forms of synaptic plasticity and memory storage. In the forebrain, the anchoring protein gravin recruits a signaling complex containing PKA, PKC, calmodulin, and PDE4D to the β2-adrenergic receptor. Here, we show that mice lacking the α-isoform of gravin have deficits in PKA-dependent long-lasting forms of hippocampal synaptic plasticity including β2-adrenergic receptor-mediated plasticity, and selective impairments of long-term memory storage. Further, both hippocampal β2-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation by PKA, and learning-induced activation of ERK, are attenuated in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in mice lacking gravin-α. We conclude that gravin compartmentalizes a significant pool of PKA that regulates learning-induced β2-adrenergic receptor signaling and ERK activation in the hippocampus in vivo, organizing molecular interactions between glutamatergic and noradrenergic signaling pathways for long-lasting synaptic plasticity, and memory storage.

Studies of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), a cellular model of memory storage, implicate cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) in presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of LTP. The anchoring of PKA to AKAPs (A kinase-anchoring proteins) creates compartmentalized pools of PKA, but the roles of presynaptically and postsynaptically anchored forms of PKA in late-phase LTP are unclear. In this study, we have created genetically modified mice that conditionally express Ht31, an inhibitor of PKA anchoring, to probe the roles of anchored PKA in hippocampal LTP and spatial memory. Our findings show that at hippocampal Schaffer collateral CA3-CA1 synapses, theta-burst LTP requires presynaptically anchored PKA. In addition, a pool of anchored PKA in hippocampal area CA3 is required for spatial memory. These findings reveal a novel and significant role for anchored PKA signaling in cellular mechanisms underlying memory storage.

Synaptic plasticity, the activity-dependent change in the strength of neuronal connections, is a proposed cellular mechanism of memory storage that is critically regulated by protein kinases such as cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). Despite the fact that a neuron contains thousands of synapses, the expression of synaptic plasticity can be specific to subsets of synapses. This is surprising because signal transduction pathways underlying synaptic plasticity involve diffusible second messenger molecules such as cAMP and diffusible proteins such as the catalytic subunit of PKA. One way in which this specificity can be achieved is by the localization of signal transduction molecules to specific subcellular domains. Spatial compartmentalization of PKA signaling is achieved via binding to A kinase-anchoring proteins (AKAPs). We report here that pharmacological inhibition of PKA anchoring impairs synaptically activated late-phase long-term potentiation (L-LTP) in hippocampal slices. In contrast, potentiation that is induced by the pharmacological activation of the cAMP/PKA pathway, which can potentially affect all synapses within the neuron, is not impaired by inhibition of PKA anchoring. These results suggest that PKA anchoring may be particularly important for events that occur at the synapse during the induction of L-LTP, such as synaptic tagging and capture. Indeed, our results demonstrate that blocking PKA anchoring impairs synaptic tagging and capture. Thus our data highlight the idea that PKA anchoring may allow for specific populations of synapses to change in synaptic strength in the face of plasticity-related transcription that is cell-wide.