Context:
Children with critical CHD are at risk for neurodevelopmental impairments, including delays in expressive and receptive language development. However, no study has synthesised the literature regarding language abilities in children with this condition.
Objective:
We summarised the literature regarding expressive and receptive language in preschool children with critical CHD.
Data sources:
MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Child Development and Adolescent Studies, ERIC, PsycINFO, and CINAHL.
Study selection:
We included studies published between January, 1990 and 1 July, 2021, focused on children aged ≤5 years with critical CHD requiring a complex cardiac procedure at age <1 year. Language ability was documented using standardised, validated tools assessing both expressive and receptive language outcomes.
Data extraction:
Data (study, patient and language characteristics, and results) were extracted by two reviewers.
Results:
Seventeen studies were included. Among children 2–5 years old with critical CHD, there were statistically significant deficits in overall (standardised mean difference: –0.46; 95 % confidence interval: –0.56, –0.35), expressive (standardised mean difference: –0.45;95 % confidence interval: –0.54, –0.37), and receptive (standardised mean difference: –0.32; 95 % confidence interval: –0.40, –0.23) language compared to normative data. Results reported as medians were similar to meta-analysis findings. Subgroup analysis showed that children with univentricular physiology had lower language scores than children with biventricular physiology.
Conclusions:
Preschool children with critical CHD had statistically significantly lower language outcomes compared to expected population norms. Healthcare professionals should test early and often for language deficits, referring to individually tailored supports.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.